Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat: Introducing Markdown linting using Remark #177

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 7, 2024

Conversation

literat
Copy link
Contributor

@literat literat commented Jul 25, 2024

No description provided.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the feature New feature or request label Jul 25, 2024
@literat literat force-pushed the feat/issue-12-markdown-lint branch from 66caa71 to 4a70513 Compare July 26, 2024 09:02
@literat literat marked this pull request as ready for review July 26, 2024 09:03
@literat literat requested review from a team and adamkudrna as code owners July 26, 2024 09:03
@literat literat force-pushed the feat/issue-12-markdown-lint branch from 4a70513 to 9dbbef8 Compare July 26, 2024 09:34
Copy link
Contributor

@adamkudrna adamkudrna left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! I'm eager to start using it in Spirit 🙂.

packages/remark-config/package.json Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/remark-config/index.js Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/remark-config/index.js Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/remark-config/index.js Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/remark-config/index.js Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/remark-config/index.js Show resolved Hide resolved
@literat literat merged commit 7594cd7 into main Aug 7, 2024
3 checks passed
@literat literat deleted the feat/issue-12-markdown-lint branch August 7, 2024 12:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants