Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[mlir] Add SelectPass #130409

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[mlir] Add SelectPass #130409

wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

Hardcode84
Copy link
Contributor

SelectPass allows to dynamically select the pass pipeline based on attribute value attached to some top-level op.

One of usage examples is IR to have multiple gpu.modules for different vendors, each requiring different lowering pipeline (see test).

`SelectPass` allows to dynamically select the pass pipeline based on attribute value attached to some top-level op.
@Hardcode84 Hardcode84 requested review from jpienaar and joker-eph March 8, 2025 11:59
@llvmbot llvmbot added mlir:core MLIR Core Infrastructure mlir labels Mar 8, 2025
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Mar 8, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir

Author: Ivan Butygin (Hardcode84)

Changes

SelectPass allows to dynamically select the pass pipeline based on attribute value attached to some top-level op.

One of usage examples is IR to have multiple gpu.modules for different vendors, each requiring different lowering pipeline (see test).


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130409.diff

5 Files Affected:

  • (modified) mlir/include/mlir/Transforms/Passes.h (+8)
  • (modified) mlir/include/mlir/Transforms/Passes.td (+19)
  • (modified) mlir/lib/Transforms/CMakeLists.txt (+1)
  • (added) mlir/lib/Transforms/SelectPass.cpp (+132)
  • (added) mlir/test/Transforms/select-pass.mlir (+24)
diff --git a/mlir/include/mlir/Transforms/Passes.h b/mlir/include/mlir/Transforms/Passes.h
index 41f208216374f..e521705371b0b 100644
--- a/mlir/include/mlir/Transforms/Passes.h
+++ b/mlir/include/mlir/Transforms/Passes.h
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ class GreedyRewriteConfig;
 #define GEN_PASS_DECL_SYMBOLPRIVATIZE
 #define GEN_PASS_DECL_TOPOLOGICALSORT
 #define GEN_PASS_DECL_COMPOSITEFIXEDPOINTPASS
+#define GEN_PASS_DECL_SELECTPASS
 #include "mlir/Transforms/Passes.h.inc"
 
 /// Creates an instance of the Canonicalizer pass, configured with default
@@ -139,6 +140,13 @@ std::unique_ptr<Pass> createCompositeFixedPointPass(
     std::string name, llvm::function_ref<void(OpPassManager &)> populateFunc,
     int maxIterations = 10);
 
+/// Creates select pass which allows to run multiple different set of passes
+/// based on attribute value on some top-level op.
+std::unique_ptr<Pass> createSelectPass(
+    std::string name, std::string selectCondName,
+    ArrayRef<std::pair<StringRef, std::function<void(OpPassManager &)>>>
+        populateFuncs);
+
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
 // Registration
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
diff --git a/mlir/include/mlir/Transforms/Passes.td b/mlir/include/mlir/Transforms/Passes.td
index a39ab77fc8fb3..846dffb89e8f7 100644
--- a/mlir/include/mlir/Transforms/Passes.td
+++ b/mlir/include/mlir/Transforms/Passes.td
@@ -586,4 +586,23 @@ def CompositeFixedPointPass : Pass<"composite-fixed-point-pass"> {
   ];
 }
 
+def SelectPass : Pass<"select-pass"> {
+  let summary = "Select pass";
+  let description = [{
+    Select pass allows to run multiple different set of passes based on
+    attribute value on some top-level op.
+  }];
+
+  let options = [
+    Option<"name", "name", "std::string", /*default=*/"\"SelectPass\"",
+           "Select pass display name">,
+    Option<"selectCondName", "select-cond-name", "std::string", "\"select\"",
+           "Attribute name used for condition">,
+    ListOption<"selectValues", "select-values", "std::string",
+               "Values used to check select condition">,
+    ListOption<"selectPipelines", "select-pipelines", "std::string",
+               "Pipelines, assotiated with corresponding select values">,
+  ];
+}
+
 #endif // MLIR_TRANSFORMS_PASSES
diff --git a/mlir/lib/Transforms/CMakeLists.txt b/mlir/lib/Transforms/CMakeLists.txt
index 3a8088bccf299..b94e390b627d6 100644
--- a/mlir/lib/Transforms/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/mlir/lib/Transforms/CMakeLists.txt
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ add_mlir_library(MLIRTransforms
   PrintIR.cpp
   RemoveDeadValues.cpp
   SCCP.cpp
+  SelectPass.cpp
   SROA.cpp
   StripDebugInfo.cpp
   SymbolDCE.cpp
diff --git a/mlir/lib/Transforms/SelectPass.cpp b/mlir/lib/Transforms/SelectPass.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..750a6617fe9b9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/mlir/lib/Transforms/SelectPass.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+//===- SelectPass.cpp - Select pass code ----------------------------------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// SelectPass allows to run multiple different set of passes based on attribute
+// value on some top-level op.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "mlir/Transforms/Passes.h"
+
+#include "mlir/Pass/Pass.h"
+#include "mlir/Pass/PassManager.h"
+
+namespace mlir {
+#define GEN_PASS_DEF_SELECTPASS
+#include "mlir/Transforms/Passes.h.inc"
+} // namespace mlir
+
+using namespace mlir;
+
+namespace {
+struct SelectPass final : public impl::SelectPassBase<SelectPass> {
+  using SelectPassBase::SelectPassBase;
+
+  SelectPass(
+      std::string name_, std::string selectCondName_,
+      ArrayRef<std::pair<StringRef, std::function<void(OpPassManager &)>>>
+          populateFuncs) {
+    name = std::move(name_);
+    selectCondName = std::move(selectCondName_);
+
+    SmallVector<std::string> selectVals;
+    SmallVector<std::string> selectPpls;
+    selectVals.reserve(populateFuncs.size());
+    selectPpls.reserve(populateFuncs.size());
+    selectPassManagers.reserve(populateFuncs.size());
+    for (auto &&[name, populate] : populateFuncs) {
+      selectVals.emplace_back(name);
+
+      auto &pm = selectPassManagers.emplace_back();
+      populate(pm);
+
+      llvm::raw_string_ostream os(selectPpls.emplace_back());
+      pm.printAsTextualPipeline(os);
+    }
+
+    selectValues = selectVals;
+    selectPipelines = selectPpls;
+  }
+
+  LogicalResult initializeOptions(
+      StringRef options,
+      function_ref<LogicalResult(const Twine &)> errorHandler) override {
+    if (failed(SelectPassBase::initializeOptions(options, errorHandler)))
+      return failure();
+
+    if (selectCondName.empty())
+      return errorHandler("Invalid select-cond-name");
+
+    if (selectValues.size() != selectPipelines.size())
+      return errorHandler("Values and pipelines size mismatch");
+
+    selectPassManagers.resize(selectPipelines.size());
+
+    for (auto &&[i, pipeline] : llvm::enumerate(selectPipelines)) {
+      if (failed(parsePassPipeline(pipeline, selectPassManagers[i])))
+        return errorHandler("Failed to parse pipeline");
+    }
+
+    return success();
+  }
+
+  LogicalResult initialize(MLIRContext *context) override {
+    condAttrName = StringAttr::get(context, selectCondName);
+
+    selectAttrs.reserve(selectAttrs.size());
+    for (StringRef value : selectValues)
+      selectAttrs.emplace_back(StringAttr::get(context, value));
+
+    return success();
+  }
+
+  void getDependentDialects(DialectRegistry &registry) const override {
+    for (const OpPassManager &pipeline : selectPassManagers)
+      pipeline.getDependentDialects(registry);
+  }
+
+  void runOnOperation() override {
+    Operation *op = getOperation();
+    Attribute condAttrValue = op->getAttr(condAttrName);
+    if (!condAttrValue) {
+      op->emitError("Condition attribute not present: ") << condAttrName;
+      return signalPassFailure();
+    }
+
+    for (auto &&[value, pm] :
+         llvm::zip_equal(selectAttrs, selectPassManagers)) {
+      if (value != condAttrValue)
+        continue;
+
+      if (failed(runPipeline(pm, op)))
+        return signalPassFailure();
+
+      return;
+    }
+
+    op->emitError("Unhandled condition value: ") << condAttrValue;
+    return signalPassFailure();
+  }
+
+protected:
+  StringRef getName() const override { return name; }
+
+private:
+  StringAttr condAttrName;
+  SmallVector<Attribute> selectAttrs;
+  SmallVector<OpPassManager> selectPassManagers;
+};
+} // namespace
+
+std::unique_ptr<Pass> mlir::createSelectPass(
+    std::string name, std::string selectCondName,
+    ArrayRef<std::pair<StringRef, std::function<void(OpPassManager &)>>>
+        populateFuncs) {
+  return std::make_unique<SelectPass>(std::move(name),
+                                      std::move(selectCondName), populateFuncs);
+}
diff --git a/mlir/test/Transforms/select-pass.mlir b/mlir/test/Transforms/select-pass.mlir
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..fb93486b94ed7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/mlir/test/Transforms/select-pass.mlir
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+// RUN: mlir-opt %s -pass-pipeline='builtin.module(gpu.module(select-pass{ \
+// RUN:     name=TestSelectPass \
+// RUN:     select-cond-name=test.attr \
+// RUN:     select-values=rocdl,nvvm \
+// RUN:     select-pipelines=convert-gpu-to-rocdl,convert-gpu-to-nvvm \
+// RUN:     }))' -split-input-file | FileCheck %s
+
+gpu.module @rocdl_module attributes {test.attr = "rocdl"} {
+// CHECK-LABEL: func @foo()
+// CHECK: rocdl.workitem.id.x
+  func.func @foo() -> index {
+    %0 = gpu.thread_id x
+    return %0 : index
+  }
+}
+
+gpu.module @nvvm_module attributes {test.attr = "nvvm"} {
+// CHECK-LABEL: func @bar()
+// CHECK: nvvm.read.ptx.sreg.tid.x
+  func.func @bar() -> index {
+    %0 = gpu.thread_id x
+    return %0 : index
+  }
+}

@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Mar 8, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir-core

Author: Ivan Butygin (Hardcode84)

Changes

SelectPass allows to dynamically select the pass pipeline based on attribute value attached to some top-level op.

One of usage examples is IR to have multiple gpu.modules for different vendors, each requiring different lowering pipeline (see test).


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130409.diff

5 Files Affected:

  • (modified) mlir/include/mlir/Transforms/Passes.h (+8)
  • (modified) mlir/include/mlir/Transforms/Passes.td (+19)
  • (modified) mlir/lib/Transforms/CMakeLists.txt (+1)
  • (added) mlir/lib/Transforms/SelectPass.cpp (+132)
  • (added) mlir/test/Transforms/select-pass.mlir (+24)
diff --git a/mlir/include/mlir/Transforms/Passes.h b/mlir/include/mlir/Transforms/Passes.h
index 41f208216374f..e521705371b0b 100644
--- a/mlir/include/mlir/Transforms/Passes.h
+++ b/mlir/include/mlir/Transforms/Passes.h
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ class GreedyRewriteConfig;
 #define GEN_PASS_DECL_SYMBOLPRIVATIZE
 #define GEN_PASS_DECL_TOPOLOGICALSORT
 #define GEN_PASS_DECL_COMPOSITEFIXEDPOINTPASS
+#define GEN_PASS_DECL_SELECTPASS
 #include "mlir/Transforms/Passes.h.inc"
 
 /// Creates an instance of the Canonicalizer pass, configured with default
@@ -139,6 +140,13 @@ std::unique_ptr<Pass> createCompositeFixedPointPass(
     std::string name, llvm::function_ref<void(OpPassManager &)> populateFunc,
     int maxIterations = 10);
 
+/// Creates select pass which allows to run multiple different set of passes
+/// based on attribute value on some top-level op.
+std::unique_ptr<Pass> createSelectPass(
+    std::string name, std::string selectCondName,
+    ArrayRef<std::pair<StringRef, std::function<void(OpPassManager &)>>>
+        populateFuncs);
+
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
 // Registration
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
diff --git a/mlir/include/mlir/Transforms/Passes.td b/mlir/include/mlir/Transforms/Passes.td
index a39ab77fc8fb3..846dffb89e8f7 100644
--- a/mlir/include/mlir/Transforms/Passes.td
+++ b/mlir/include/mlir/Transforms/Passes.td
@@ -586,4 +586,23 @@ def CompositeFixedPointPass : Pass<"composite-fixed-point-pass"> {
   ];
 }
 
+def SelectPass : Pass<"select-pass"> {
+  let summary = "Select pass";
+  let description = [{
+    Select pass allows to run multiple different set of passes based on
+    attribute value on some top-level op.
+  }];
+
+  let options = [
+    Option<"name", "name", "std::string", /*default=*/"\"SelectPass\"",
+           "Select pass display name">,
+    Option<"selectCondName", "select-cond-name", "std::string", "\"select\"",
+           "Attribute name used for condition">,
+    ListOption<"selectValues", "select-values", "std::string",
+               "Values used to check select condition">,
+    ListOption<"selectPipelines", "select-pipelines", "std::string",
+               "Pipelines, assotiated with corresponding select values">,
+  ];
+}
+
 #endif // MLIR_TRANSFORMS_PASSES
diff --git a/mlir/lib/Transforms/CMakeLists.txt b/mlir/lib/Transforms/CMakeLists.txt
index 3a8088bccf299..b94e390b627d6 100644
--- a/mlir/lib/Transforms/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/mlir/lib/Transforms/CMakeLists.txt
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ add_mlir_library(MLIRTransforms
   PrintIR.cpp
   RemoveDeadValues.cpp
   SCCP.cpp
+  SelectPass.cpp
   SROA.cpp
   StripDebugInfo.cpp
   SymbolDCE.cpp
diff --git a/mlir/lib/Transforms/SelectPass.cpp b/mlir/lib/Transforms/SelectPass.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..750a6617fe9b9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/mlir/lib/Transforms/SelectPass.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+//===- SelectPass.cpp - Select pass code ----------------------------------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// SelectPass allows to run multiple different set of passes based on attribute
+// value on some top-level op.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "mlir/Transforms/Passes.h"
+
+#include "mlir/Pass/Pass.h"
+#include "mlir/Pass/PassManager.h"
+
+namespace mlir {
+#define GEN_PASS_DEF_SELECTPASS
+#include "mlir/Transforms/Passes.h.inc"
+} // namespace mlir
+
+using namespace mlir;
+
+namespace {
+struct SelectPass final : public impl::SelectPassBase<SelectPass> {
+  using SelectPassBase::SelectPassBase;
+
+  SelectPass(
+      std::string name_, std::string selectCondName_,
+      ArrayRef<std::pair<StringRef, std::function<void(OpPassManager &)>>>
+          populateFuncs) {
+    name = std::move(name_);
+    selectCondName = std::move(selectCondName_);
+
+    SmallVector<std::string> selectVals;
+    SmallVector<std::string> selectPpls;
+    selectVals.reserve(populateFuncs.size());
+    selectPpls.reserve(populateFuncs.size());
+    selectPassManagers.reserve(populateFuncs.size());
+    for (auto &&[name, populate] : populateFuncs) {
+      selectVals.emplace_back(name);
+
+      auto &pm = selectPassManagers.emplace_back();
+      populate(pm);
+
+      llvm::raw_string_ostream os(selectPpls.emplace_back());
+      pm.printAsTextualPipeline(os);
+    }
+
+    selectValues = selectVals;
+    selectPipelines = selectPpls;
+  }
+
+  LogicalResult initializeOptions(
+      StringRef options,
+      function_ref<LogicalResult(const Twine &)> errorHandler) override {
+    if (failed(SelectPassBase::initializeOptions(options, errorHandler)))
+      return failure();
+
+    if (selectCondName.empty())
+      return errorHandler("Invalid select-cond-name");
+
+    if (selectValues.size() != selectPipelines.size())
+      return errorHandler("Values and pipelines size mismatch");
+
+    selectPassManagers.resize(selectPipelines.size());
+
+    for (auto &&[i, pipeline] : llvm::enumerate(selectPipelines)) {
+      if (failed(parsePassPipeline(pipeline, selectPassManagers[i])))
+        return errorHandler("Failed to parse pipeline");
+    }
+
+    return success();
+  }
+
+  LogicalResult initialize(MLIRContext *context) override {
+    condAttrName = StringAttr::get(context, selectCondName);
+
+    selectAttrs.reserve(selectAttrs.size());
+    for (StringRef value : selectValues)
+      selectAttrs.emplace_back(StringAttr::get(context, value));
+
+    return success();
+  }
+
+  void getDependentDialects(DialectRegistry &registry) const override {
+    for (const OpPassManager &pipeline : selectPassManagers)
+      pipeline.getDependentDialects(registry);
+  }
+
+  void runOnOperation() override {
+    Operation *op = getOperation();
+    Attribute condAttrValue = op->getAttr(condAttrName);
+    if (!condAttrValue) {
+      op->emitError("Condition attribute not present: ") << condAttrName;
+      return signalPassFailure();
+    }
+
+    for (auto &&[value, pm] :
+         llvm::zip_equal(selectAttrs, selectPassManagers)) {
+      if (value != condAttrValue)
+        continue;
+
+      if (failed(runPipeline(pm, op)))
+        return signalPassFailure();
+
+      return;
+    }
+
+    op->emitError("Unhandled condition value: ") << condAttrValue;
+    return signalPassFailure();
+  }
+
+protected:
+  StringRef getName() const override { return name; }
+
+private:
+  StringAttr condAttrName;
+  SmallVector<Attribute> selectAttrs;
+  SmallVector<OpPassManager> selectPassManagers;
+};
+} // namespace
+
+std::unique_ptr<Pass> mlir::createSelectPass(
+    std::string name, std::string selectCondName,
+    ArrayRef<std::pair<StringRef, std::function<void(OpPassManager &)>>>
+        populateFuncs) {
+  return std::make_unique<SelectPass>(std::move(name),
+                                      std::move(selectCondName), populateFuncs);
+}
diff --git a/mlir/test/Transforms/select-pass.mlir b/mlir/test/Transforms/select-pass.mlir
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..fb93486b94ed7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/mlir/test/Transforms/select-pass.mlir
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+// RUN: mlir-opt %s -pass-pipeline='builtin.module(gpu.module(select-pass{ \
+// RUN:     name=TestSelectPass \
+// RUN:     select-cond-name=test.attr \
+// RUN:     select-values=rocdl,nvvm \
+// RUN:     select-pipelines=convert-gpu-to-rocdl,convert-gpu-to-nvvm \
+// RUN:     }))' -split-input-file | FileCheck %s
+
+gpu.module @rocdl_module attributes {test.attr = "rocdl"} {
+// CHECK-LABEL: func @foo()
+// CHECK: rocdl.workitem.id.x
+  func.func @foo() -> index {
+    %0 = gpu.thread_id x
+    return %0 : index
+  }
+}
+
+gpu.module @nvvm_module attributes {test.attr = "nvvm"} {
+// CHECK-LABEL: func @bar()
+// CHECK: nvvm.read.ptx.sreg.tid.x
+  func.func @bar() -> index {
+    %0 = gpu.thread_id x
+    return %0 : index
+  }
+}

Copy link
Member

@jpienaar jpienaar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, this will be useful, thanks! I had someone ask for something like this recently.

let summary = "Select pass";
let description = [{
Select pass allows to run multiple different set of passes based on
attribute value on some top-level op.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would this be on the top level it's run on?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@Hardcode84 Hardcode84 Mar 8, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Technically, not necessarily on top-level op, just on the op pass is rooted on, clarified the doc.

return failure();

if (selectCondName.empty())
return errorHandler("Invalid select-cond-name");
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this the only requirement on it? (To be specified)

void runOnOperation() override {
Operation *op = getOperation();
Attribute condAttrValue = op->getAttr(condAttrName);
if (!condAttrValue) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OOC, what about introducing a default state, so if none is specified the default is run. So the pass always runs but the attribute is used for refinement. (Could also be a TODO here and follow.up)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added a TODO for now

return signalPassFailure();
}

for (auto &&[value, pm] :
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are probably few enough instances that a linear search would be appropriate but could be revised if needed.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, realistically this pass will only have a few options, so linear search should be fine.

def SelectPass : Pass<"select-pass"> {
let summary = "Select pass";
let description = [{
Select pass allows to run multiple different set of passes based on
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Multiple different sets, makes me think of something else than switching on attribute to select pipeline.

Dynamically selects pass pipeline to run based on top level op attribute.

Copy link
Collaborator

@joker-eph joker-eph left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is seems quite an ad-hoc mechanism to me.

We played with the concept before but it's hard to make it really widely applicable: you quickly need a real language to express the condition beyond the simple "match an attribute to this exact value" that you demonstrate here. The value-add of a pass presented as "generic" instead of letting one implement their own pass for their use-case isn't totally clear to me right now.

private:
StringAttr condAttrName;
SmallVector<Attribute> selectAttrs;
SmallVector<OpPassManager> selectPassManagers;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's not clear to me how is this handled with respect to serialization? Can you clarify please.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

selectPipelines contains the textual representation of pipelines and it's serialized. selectPassManagers are just cached pipelines to be used when we actually run the pass.

@jpienaar
Copy link
Member

We played with the concept before but it's hard to make it really widely applicable: you quickly need a real language to express the condition beyond the simple "match an attribute to this exact value" that you demonstrate here

While true, this is also quite common. E.g., this mechanism is sufficient to replace many of the command line flags usage that is being threaded through rather ad hoc manner at the moment by multiple different teams. One could always have a "flatten to simple choice" pass that is specific to user and flattens complicated logic into simple attributes. That avoids needing a language in the selector as its in the pass. Yes, it just moves the complexity but there are many cases that don't need this complexity - at least not at the level of pass pipelines. Which is why I'm supportive (common enough, usable by multiple groups & simple).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
mlir:core MLIR Core Infrastructure mlir
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants