Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: [cmake] Added feature for switching cmake kit #844

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 31, 2024

Conversation

Kakueeen
Copy link
Contributor

as title

Log: new feature

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

deepin pr auto review

关键摘要:

  • KitPage类的initUI函数中,kitComboBox的宽度设置为220,但在实际的UI布局中,这个宽度可能会导致组合框显示不全。
  • KitPage类的readConfig函数中,使用了kitComboBox->findData(id)来查找组合框中的索引,但没有检查id是否存在于组合框的选项中。如果id不存在,这将导致kitComboBox->currentIndex返回一个无效的索引。
  • KitPage类的saveConfig函数中,如果param->kitId没有改变,则不执行任何操作。这种设计可能会导致用户修改了kitComboBox的值,但kitId没有改变时,配置不会被保存。
  • KitManager::instance()->setKitList函数被调用,但没有检查返回值。如果setKitList函数的实现有问题,可能会导致未处理的初始化错误。
  • DAPDebugger::attachDebug函数中,debuggerTool变量被直接使用,但没有检查debuggerTool是否为空或无效。
  • DAPDebugger::attachDebug函数中,当debuggerTool不是"gdb"时,直接返回并打印错误信息,没有提供其他调试器连接的逻辑。

是否建议立即修改:

  • 应该立即修正KitPage类的readConfigsaveConfig函数中的潜在错误,以避免潜在的运行时错误。
  • 需要确保KitManager::instance()->setKitList的调用不会引入问题,或者至少有适当的错误处理机制。
  • DAPDebugger::attachDebug函数中的错误处理逻辑应该更加健壮,包括处理其他调试器连接的情况,而不仅仅是"gdb"

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Kakueeen, LiHua000
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign toberyan for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@deepin-mozart deepin-mozart merged commit cc4fd7b into linuxdeepin:master Jul 31, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants