Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: if not amd64, no knowledge base can use. #164

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 19, 2024

Conversation

lichaofan2008
Copy link
Contributor

Description: if not amd64, no knowledge base can use.

Log:

Bug: https://pms.uniontech.com/bug-view-295697.html

Description: if not amd64, no knowledge base can use.

Log:

Bug: https://pms.uniontech.com/bug-view-295697.html
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

deepin pr auto review

代码审查意见:

  1. 代码重复:在adjustBts函数中,m_knowledgeBt->setVisible(false);被重复调用两次,建议将这部分代码提取到一个单独的函数中,以减少代码重复。

  2. 条件编译的使用:使用#ifndef ENABLE_AI_SEARCH进行条件编译是一个好的做法,但是需要确保ENABLE_AI_SEARCH这个宏在所有相关的地方都被正确地定义和设置。

  3. 逻辑判断的顺序:在adjustBts函数中,if (actionCounts == 1)else if (actionCounts > 1)的判断顺序可能会影响逻辑的正确性。如果actionCounts的值大于1,那么m_omitBt->setVisible(false);m_knowledgeAction->setVisible(false);都会被执行,这可能不是预期的行为。建议调整判断的顺序,确保逻辑符合预期。

  4. 变量命名actionCounts这个变量名不够直观,建议使用更具描述性的变量名,以便其他开发者更容易理解其用途。

  5. 注释和文档:代码中没有足够的注释来解释adjustBts函数的目的和逻辑,建议添加注释来提高代码的可读性和可维护性。

  6. 性能考虑:如果adjustBts函数被频繁调用,那么频繁地调用setVisible方法可能会影响性能。建议评估是否有必要在每次调用时都更新可见性,或者是否有更高效的方法来管理这些按钮的可见性。

  7. 错误处理:代码中没有明显的错误处理逻辑。如果m_knowledgeBtm_omitBtnullptr,调用setVisible方法可能会导致程序崩溃。建议在调用setVisible之前检查这些指针是否为nullptr

综上所述,代码在重复性、逻辑清晰度、变量命名、注释、性能和错误处理方面存在一些改进空间。

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Clauszy, lichaofan2008

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@lichaofan2008
Copy link
Contributor Author

/forcemerge

@deepin-bot
Copy link

deepin-bot bot commented Dec 19, 2024

This pr force merged! (status: blocked)

@deepin-bot deepin-bot bot merged commit bc39f4b into linuxdeepin:master Dec 19, 2024
7 of 9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants