Add Linked Open Vocabularies recommended ontology metadata #210
Conversation
| @@ -497,14 +498,6 @@ slots: | |||
| in_subset: | |||
| - BasicSubset | |||
|
|
|||
| publisher: | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
we should probably deprecate this slot rather than delete.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It isn't deleted, you can find it at line 2632 😇
I didn't delete any existing attribute, I only modified them to add some information.
| - https://creativecommons.org/ns | ||
| - https://lov.linkeddata.es/Recommendations_Vocabulary_Design.pdf | ||
|
|
||
| creator: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
should creator and contributor be multivalued?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I had the exact same question while defining this but seemingly it's a single person according to Dublin Core:
I think it's possible to define multiple creators within an organization and reference it here 😊
| @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ prefixes: | |||
| qudt: http://qudt.org/schema/qudt/ | |||
| cdisc: http://rdf.cdisc.org/mms# | |||
| SIO: http://semanticscience.org/resource/SIO_ | |||
| cc: http://creativecommons.org/ns# | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Let's stick to established prefixes, e.g bioregistry
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I can't understand which part of this prefix is troublesome 😌
Is it the use of cc which is too short ?
Or is it that Creative Commons cannot be considered as an established prefix ?
| - https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/#http://purl.org/dc/terms/creator | ||
| - https://lov.linkeddata.es/Recommendations_Vocabulary_Design.pdf | ||
|
|
||
| contributor: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
we already have contributors, which can be applied at any level (schema, element, ...)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I added this to be compliant with the Linked Open Vocabularies standards but I imagine I can just change the behavior in the OWL generator to convert contributors to contributor ?
Then I'll have to find a way to manage multiple entries 🤔
vincentkelleher
force-pushed
the
add_ontology_description_fields
branch
from
596755f to
1fb956b
Compare
Signed-off-by: Vincent Kelleher <[email protected]>
vincentkelleher
force-pushed
the
add_ontology_description_fields
branch
from
1fb956b to
434ec7d
Compare
What should be the granularity of those PRs ? One per attribute ? |
What makes ontologies awesome is their reusability. To be reused an ontology needs to be discoverable and easily understandable through documentation (FAIR principles mention those requirements).
At Gaia-X we are working on making our LinkML generated ontology more discoverable and better documented through ontology metadata. The Linked Open Vocabularies project gives recommendations about how an ontology can be described through metadata by using well established vocabularies such as Dublin Core Terms, Creative Commons and OWL.
This pull request proposes a solution to integrate slots for this metadata in the schema definition to then use those slots in the LinkML generators.