-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 95
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: set-up the all-contributors bot front-end #866
Conversation
@raizo07 is attempting to deploy a commit to the LFG Labs Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe changes involve updating the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
@all-contributors please add @raizo07 for code |
I've put up a pull request to add @raizo07! 🎉 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
README.md (2)
73-80
: LGTM! Clear instructions for contributors.The new section provides clear and helpful instructions for contributors to add themselves using the All Contributors bot. The example is well-formatted and the reference to the emoji key is useful.
Consider adding a brief explanation of what the All Contributors bot does for those unfamiliar with it. For example:
+The All Contributors bot automatically updates the contributors list in this README when you use the command below. If you've contributed to this project, you can easily add yourself to the contributors list by commenting on any issue or pull request with: `@all-contributors please add <your-github-username> for <contribution-type>`
Line range hint
83-95
: Fix grammatical error and remove unnecessary number.There's a minor grammatical error in the introductory sentence, and an unnecessary number that should be removed.
Please apply the following changes:
-Thanks goes to these wonderful people 1: +Thanks go to these wonderful people:🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[typographical] ~84-~84: It seems that a comma is missing.
Context: ...cs/en/emoji-key). ## Contributors ✨ Thanks goes to these wonderful people 1: <!--...(THANKS_COMMA)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- .all-contributorsrc (1 hunks)
- README.md (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[typographical] ~84-~84: It seems that a comma is missing.
Context: ...cs/en/emoji-key). ## Contributors ✨ Thanks goes to these wonderful people 1: <!--...(THANKS_COMMA)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
.all-contributorsrc (5)
2-4
: LGTM: Configuration looks good.The "files" array correctly targets README.md, the image size is appropriate, and setting "commit" to false is a good practice for manual review of changes.
5-5
: LGTM: Empty contributors array is correct for initial setup.Starting with an empty contributors array allows the bot to begin tracking contributions from this point forward.
11-11
: LGTM: CI skip configuration is appropriate.Setting "skipCi" to true is a good practice. It prevents unnecessary CI runs for documentation updates made by the bot.
12-12
: Verify commit convention alignment with project guidelines.The "commitConvention" is set to "none", which means the bot will use simple commit messages without any specific convention. Please verify if this aligns with your project's commit message guidelines.
Let's check for any existing commit message guidelines:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for commit message guidelines in common locations # Test: Check README.md for commit guidelines if grep -qi "commit.*guideline" README.md; then echo "Potential commit guidelines found in README.md" fi # Test: Check CONTRIBUTING.md for commit guidelines if [ -f CONTRIBUTING.md ] && grep -qi "commit.*guideline" CONTRIBUTING.md; then echo "Potential commit guidelines found in CONTRIBUTING.md" fi # Test: Check for commitlint configuration if [ -f .commitlintrc.json ] || [ -f .commitlintrc.js ] || [ -f commitlint.config.js ]; then echo "Commitlint configuration found. The project might be using conventional commits." fiIf any guidelines are found, consider updating the "commitConvention" to match your project's standards.
6-8
: LGTM: Project details updated correctly.The contributors per line, project name, and project owner are set appropriately. These changes align with the PR objectives.
Let's verify the project details:
README.md (2)
96-97
: LGTM! Good inclusion of project specifications.These lines correctly mention following the all-contributors specification and encourage contributions, which aligns well with the project's goals.
Line range hint
73-97
: Overall, great implementation of the All Contributors bot setup!The changes to the README.md file successfully implement the front-end setup for the All Contributors bot, aligning well with the PR objectives. The new sections provide clear instructions for contributors and set up the necessary placeholders for the bot to function correctly.
A few minor suggestions have been made to improve clarity and correct small errors, but overall, this is a solid implementation that enhances the project's ability to recognize and encourage contributions.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[typographical] ~84-~84: It seems that a comma is missing.
Context: ...cs/en/emoji-key). ## Contributors ✨ Thanks goes to these wonderful people 1: <!--...(THANKS_COMMA)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
https://github.com/all-contributors please add @raizo07 for code |
Pull Request type
Set-up the all-contributors bot front-end
Please add the labels corresponding to the type of changes your PR introduces:
Resolves: #857
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation