Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: set-up the all-contributors bot front-end #866

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 9, 2024

Conversation

raizo07
Copy link
Contributor

@raizo07 raizo07 commented Oct 9, 2024

Pull Request type

Set-up the all-contributors bot front-end

Please add the labels corresponding to the type of changes your PR introduces:

  • Feature
  • Documentation content changes

Resolves: #857

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Project renamed to "Starknet Quest."
    • Added a section in the README for contributors to add themselves.
    • Introduced a "Contributors ✨" section to acknowledge contributions.
    • Specified adherence to the all-contributors guidelines in the README.
  • Documentation

    • Updated README with new contributor instructions and formatting adjustments.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 9, 2024

@raizo07 is attempting to deploy a commit to the LFG Labs Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve updating the .all-contributorsrc configuration file to reflect the project's new name, "Starknet Quest," and the new project owner, "lfglabs-dev." The configuration has been modified to remove the "commit" field, add a "skipCi" field, and update the "commitConvention." Additionally, the README.md file has been enhanced with new sections for contributor instructions and acknowledgment, aligning with the all-contributors specification.

Changes

File Change Summary
.all-contributorsrc Updated project name and owner, modified commit fields, added skipCi field, and updated commitConvention.
README.md Added sections for contributor instructions and acknowledgment, and updated project specification note.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Set up the initial configuration (857)
Update the README.md file with the contributors section (857)
Document the process for contributors to add themselves (857)

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8e1bda5 and 2c24c1d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • README.md

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@raizo07
Copy link
Contributor Author

raizo07 commented Oct 9, 2024

@all-contributors please add @raizo07 for code

Copy link
Contributor

@raizo07

I've put up a pull request to add @raizo07! 🎉

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
README.md (2)

73-80: LGTM! Clear instructions for contributors.

The new section provides clear and helpful instructions for contributors to add themselves using the All Contributors bot. The example is well-formatted and the reference to the emoji key is useful.

Consider adding a brief explanation of what the All Contributors bot does for those unfamiliar with it. For example:

+The All Contributors bot automatically updates the contributors list in this README when you use the command below.
 If you've contributed to this project, you can easily add yourself to the contributors list by commenting on any issue or pull request with: `@all-contributors please add <your-github-username> for <contribution-type>`

Line range hint 83-95: Fix grammatical error and remove unnecessary number.

There's a minor grammatical error in the introductory sentence, and an unnecessary number that should be removed.

Please apply the following changes:

-Thanks goes to these wonderful people 1:
+Thanks go to these wonderful people:
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[typographical] ~84-~84: It seems that a comma is missing.
Context: ...cs/en/emoji-key). ## Contributors ✨ Thanks goes to these wonderful people 1: <!--...

(THANKS_COMMA)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f6ca8f7 and 8e1bda5.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .all-contributorsrc (1 hunks)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[typographical] ~84-~84: It seems that a comma is missing.
Context: ...cs/en/emoji-key). ## Contributors ✨ Thanks goes to these wonderful people 1: <!--...

(THANKS_COMMA)

🔇 Additional comments (7)
.all-contributorsrc (5)

2-4: LGTM: Configuration looks good.

The "files" array correctly targets README.md, the image size is appropriate, and setting "commit" to false is a good practice for manual review of changes.


5-5: LGTM: Empty contributors array is correct for initial setup.

Starting with an empty contributors array allows the bot to begin tracking contributions from this point forward.


11-11: LGTM: CI skip configuration is appropriate.

Setting "skipCi" to true is a good practice. It prevents unnecessary CI runs for documentation updates made by the bot.


12-12: Verify commit convention alignment with project guidelines.

The "commitConvention" is set to "none", which means the bot will use simple commit messages without any specific convention. Please verify if this aligns with your project's commit message guidelines.

Let's check for any existing commit message guidelines:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for commit message guidelines in common locations

# Test: Check README.md for commit guidelines
if grep -qi "commit.*guideline" README.md; then
  echo "Potential commit guidelines found in README.md"
fi

# Test: Check CONTRIBUTING.md for commit guidelines
if [ -f CONTRIBUTING.md ] && grep -qi "commit.*guideline" CONTRIBUTING.md; then
  echo "Potential commit guidelines found in CONTRIBUTING.md"
fi

# Test: Check for commitlint configuration
if [ -f .commitlintrc.json ] || [ -f .commitlintrc.js ] || [ -f commitlint.config.js ]; then
  echo "Commitlint configuration found. The project might be using conventional commits."
fi

If any guidelines are found, consider updating the "commitConvention" to match your project's standards.


6-8: LGTM: Project details updated correctly.

The contributors per line, project name, and project owner are set appropriately. These changes align with the PR objectives.

Let's verify the project details:

README.md (2)

96-97: LGTM! Good inclusion of project specifications.

These lines correctly mention following the all-contributors specification and encourage contributions, which aligns well with the project's goals.


Line range hint 73-97: Overall, great implementation of the All Contributors bot setup!

The changes to the README.md file successfully implement the front-end setup for the All Contributors bot, aligning well with the PR objectives. The new sections provide clear instructions for contributors and set up the necessary placeholders for the bot to function correctly.

A few minor suggestions have been made to improve clarity and correct small errors, but overall, this is a solid implementation that enhances the project's ability to recognize and encourage contributions.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[typographical] ~84-~84: It seems that a comma is missing.
Context: ...cs/en/emoji-key). ## Contributors ✨ Thanks goes to these wonderful people 1: <!--...

(THANKS_COMMA)

Copy link
Contributor

@fricoben fricoben left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@fricoben fricoben merged commit 0c4b5b0 into lfglabs-dev:testnet Oct 9, 2024
1 of 3 checks passed
@fricoben
Copy link
Contributor

fricoben commented Oct 9, 2024

https://github.com/all-contributors please add @raizo07 for code

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add All Contributors bot front-end
2 participants