Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Boosts Quest Count Mismatch #818

Closed

Conversation

mystical-prog
Copy link
Contributor

@mystical-prog mystical-prog commented Aug 19, 2024

Boosts Quest Collection Display Info Mismatch Fixed

I have made necessary changes in the components/pages/home/questAndCollectionTabs.tsx file wherein I have modified the filter for completedBoostQuests to consider expiry of the quests. I have also changed the state to render on the page from boosts.length to displayBoosts.length to show the correct count. These changes achieve the desired fixes.

Resolves: #804

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced tracking of completed boosts by incorporating expiry checks, ensuring only recent and valid boosts are displayed.
    • Updated user interface to accurately reflect the count of completed boosts based on new filtering criteria.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Aug 19, 2024

@mystical-prog is attempting to deploy a commit to the StarknetID Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes enhance the logic for tracking completed boosts by refining the criteria used to determine which boosts are counted. Now, boosts are only considered if they are valid and within the last three weeks, improving both the accuracy of the count and its representation in the user interface.

Changes

File Change Summary
components/pages/home/questAndCollectionTabs.tsx Updated logic to compute completed boosts by adding expiry checks and modifying display logic to align with new criteria.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Collection quest info mismatch ! (#804)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
components/pages/home/questAndCollectionTabs.tsx (1)

227-233: Improve pluralization logic for "Boosts".

The current logic for pluralizing "Boosts" could be improved to ensure it correctly reflects the number of boosts. Consider using a utility function or a more concise conditional expression.

-                          `${completedBoostNumber}/${displayBoosts.length} Boost${
-                            boosts.length > 1 ? "s" : ""
-                          } done`
+                          `${completedBoostNumber}/${displayBoosts.length} Boost${displayBoosts.length !== 1 ? "s" : ""} done`
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3b1cecf and 02c79e7.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/pages/home/questAndCollectionTabs.tsx (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
components/pages/home/questAndCollectionTabs.tsx (1)

Line range hint 1-238: Overall changes approved with a suggestion to verify logic integration.

The changes effectively address the issue of quest count mismatches by refining the logic for completed boosts and updating the display accordingly. Ensure that the logic is consistently applied throughout the codebase and verify that all related functionalities are correctly integrated.

Comment on lines +116 to +117
() => boosts?.filter((b) => completedBoostIds?.includes(b.id) && ((new Date().getTime() - boost.expiry) / MILLISECONDS_PER_WEEK <= 3 &&
boost.expiry < Date.now())).length,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review the expiry condition logic.

The condition (new Date().getTime() - boost.expiry) / MILLISECONDS_PER_WEEK <= 3 && boost.expiry < Date.now() seems to have a logical error. The check should ensure that the boost is not expired rather than checking if it's within the last three weeks and expired. Consider revising the logic to accurately reflect the intended condition.

-    () => boosts?.filter((b) => completedBoostIds?.includes(b.id) && ((new Date().getTime() - boost.expiry) / MILLISECONDS_PER_WEEK <= 3 &&
-          boost.expiry < Date.now())).length,
+    () => boosts?.filter((b) => completedBoostIds?.includes(b.id) && (boost.expiry - new Date().getTime()) / MILLISECONDS_PER_WEEK <= 3).length,
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
() => boosts?.filter((b) => completedBoostIds?.includes(b.id) && ((new Date().getTime() - boost.expiry) / MILLISECONDS_PER_WEEK <= 3 &&
boost.expiry < Date.now())).length,
() => boosts?.filter((b) => completedBoostIds?.includes(b.id) && (boost.expiry - new Date().getTime()) / MILLISECONDS_PER_WEEK <= 3).length,

@Marchand-Nicolas
Copy link
Collaborator

Sorry, someone has already been assigned for this issue (in the context of the Only Dust hackathon)

@mystical-prog
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry, someone has already been assigned for this issue (in the context of the Only Dust hackathon)

No worries, but I opened up this PR before OD Hack started and the target issue was not having OD Hack label, nevertheless thank you

@Marchand-Nicolas
Copy link
Collaborator

Marchand-Nicolas commented Aug 25, 2024

No worries, but I opened up this PR before OD Hack started and the target issue was not having OD Hack label, nevertheless thank you

I'm really sorry to hear that. We'll pay more attention to that for the next hackathon. Thank you for telling me

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Collection quest info mismatch !
2 participants