Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 Fix get with using_key #2042

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 10, 2024
Merged

🐛 Fix get with using_key #2042

merged 4 commits into from
Oct 10, 2024

Conversation

sunnyosun
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@sunnyosun sunnyosun linked an issue Oct 10, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@sunnyosun sunnyosun changed the title 🐛 Fix get with using_key 🐛 Fix get with using_key Oct 10, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.39%. Comparing base (5abfc41) to head (49eb3b5).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2042      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.26%   92.39%   +0.13%     
==========================================
  Files          54       54              
  Lines        6324     6341      +17     
==========================================
+ Hits         5835     5859      +24     
+ Misses        489      482       -7     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot temporarily deployed to pull request October 10, 2024 18:38 Inactive
@sunnyosun sunnyosun merged commit 5700bb1 into main Oct 10, 2024
16 checks passed
@sunnyosun sunnyosun deleted the fix-get branch October 10, 2024 18:38
@falexwolf
Copy link
Member

Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

.using().get(uid) doesn't work
2 participants