-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: separate deny and allow rules #272
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #272 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 27.20% 29.07% +1.87%
==========================================
Files 30 30
Lines 1066 1183 +117
==========================================
+ Hits 290 344 +54
- Misses 728 791 +63
Partials 48 48 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
9120711
to
2b1c9a4
Compare
Signed-off-by: Charles-Edouard Brétéché <[email protected]>
eddfd65
to
a8ea3e1
Compare
2678bd5
to
a5b095a
Compare
Signed-off-by: Charles-Edouard Brétéché <[email protected]>
a5b095a
to
3768509
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the allow and deny code looks very similar, will it be possible to remove the duplicate parts
Yup, response types are different though i will make it generic. |
Signed-off-by: Charles-Edouard Brétéché <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Charles-Edouard Brétéché <[email protected]>
@vishal-chdhry i made changes to reduce the duplicated parts |
Explanation
Separate deny and allow rules.