Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CNV-50914: Support for ephemeral nic #2261

Merged

Conversation

metalice
Copy link
Member

📝 Description

Suuport for ephemeral nic. This nic is added by the machine and removed on restart. I added a label of ephemeral. Currently, this type of nic is causing the UI to crash.

🎥 Demo

Before: Crash , oh no something went wrong

After:

image

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 12, 2024

@metalice: This pull request references CNV-50914 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.18.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

📝 Description

Suuport for ephemeral nic. This nic is added by the machine and removed on restart. I added a label of ephemeral. Currently, this type of nic is causing the UI to crash.

🎥 Demo

Before: Crash , oh no something went wrong

After:

image

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved This issue is something we want to fix label Nov 12, 2024
Comment on lines +27 to +34
{
isInterfaceEphemeral: (
network: V1Network,
iface: V1VirtualMachineInstanceNetworkInterface,
) => undefined | V1VirtualMachineInstanceNetworkInterface;
isPending: (network: V1Network) => boolean;
vm: V1VirtualMachine;
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why passing this function in the RowProps? I think you changed idea in the middle of the work don't you?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just to keep the schema , to be same as isPending

@pcbailey
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Passed code review, ready for merge label Nov 27, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 27, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: metalice, pcbailey

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 8fc8e19 into kubevirt-ui:main Nov 27, 2024
10 checks passed
@metalice
Copy link
Member Author

/cherry-pick release-4.17

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@metalice: new pull request created: #2316

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved This issue is something we want to fix jira/valid-reference lgtm Passed code review, ready for merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants