-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 618
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[cinder-csi-plugin] add support for openstack api metrics #1899
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/hold still in progress |
notes:
/hold cancel |
/hold cancel @chrigl @jichenjc could you check this? I do not understand why cinder-e2e-test is crashlooping, I cannot reproduce that locally using new image created from this PR. As I see it, we need these metrics. I know - its not the best way to expose these if we compare to OCCM. However, its better than nothing. |
#1898 |
first... also ignoring the fact that e2e doesn't work at the moment. Before the crash loop it was incredibly flaky. In general absolute +1 for having metrics. But is this something we want to have in that form in for 1.24, or do we want to bring it in v1.25. If 1.25 is our target, would it make sense to think through it and come up with an idea to do it "better" (what ever better in that context means)? The answer cold also be both :) |
@chrigl as I see it 1.25 could be the target. Its fine for me to put this on hold and think better options. With this we can get it working and its done in similar way for instance in AWS side. sig-storage did not bring any new ideas to this "issue". |
@zetaab: PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@zetaab: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /close |
@k8s-triage-robot: Closed this PR. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
I agree metrics would be really helpful (currently having issues communicating with Cinder API, being able to easily measure and quantify it would be really useful). Any thoughts on what next steps could be here? |
What this PR does / why we need it:
see comment
#1398 (comment)
#1398 (comment)
Which issue this PR fixes(if applicable):
fixes #913
Special notes for reviewers:
Release note: