🌱 docs(footer): Add trademark disclaimer

[mariasalcedo]

What type of PR is this?
/kind documentation

What this PR does / why we need it:
Adds correct trademark disclaimer, as part of our ongoing effort to cncf/techdocs#198

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #2735

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

[k8s-ci-robot]

Welcome @mariasalcedo!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/gateway-api 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/gateway-api has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @mariasalcedo. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[mikemorris]

Looks reasonable to me, thanks for taking care of this @mariasalcedo!

/ok-to-test
/lgtm

[mariasalcedo]

@mikemorris Thanks! Please add the approved label to be able to merge it.

[robscott]

Thanks @mariasalcedo! Unfortunately we're going to need to hold off on merging this until cncf/foundation#809 is resolved.

/hold

[youngnick]

LGTM pending resolution of the license question.

[k8s-triage-robot]

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

• After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

• Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
• Close this PR with /close
• Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

[mariasalcedo]

/remove-lifecycle stale

[shaneutt]

This is blocked on cncf/foundation#809 and should continue to remain open in a holding state (but we can't mark it as frozen because its a PR, so this is just an update).

[robscott]

Now that cncf/foundation#809 has been approved, this should be good to go.

/hold cancel
/lgtm
/approve
/retest

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mariasalcedo, robscott

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [robscott]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment