bug: fix empty query for infoblox get calls

[snorwin]

Description
Set explicit query parameters to fetch objects from the Infoblox API.

Fixes #2931

Checklist

• Unit tests updated
• End user documentation updated

[linux-foundation-easycla]

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

• ✅ login: snorwin / name: Norwin Schnyder (a7c8b0d)

[k8s-ci-robot]

Welcome @snorwin!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/external-dns 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/external-dns has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: snorwin
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign raffo for approval by writing /assign @raffo in a comment. For more information see:The Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[snorwin]

I tried to update the mock in the unit test, however it was not possible to use the query parameters in the mock as the searchFields are unexported in ibclient.QueryParams.

[skalpin]

@snorwin I have a similar PR #2890, but it's being ignored and I don't know why.

[snorwin]

@skalpin I linked your PR as well to the issue I have created.

In addition, I opened an issue infobloxopen/infoblox-go-client#181 to improve the testability of the infoblox-go-client integration.

[snorwin]

/assign @ranjishmp

[k8s-ci-robot]

@snorwin: GitHub didn't allow me to assign the following users: ranjishmp.

Note that only kubernetes-sigs members, repo collaborators and people who have commented on this issue/PR can be assigned. Additionally, issues/PRs can only have 10 assignees at the same time.
For more information please see the contributor guide

In response to this:

/assign @ranjishmp
/assign @skalpin

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[snorwin]

/assign @skudriavtsev

[k8s-ci-robot]

@snorwin: GitHub didn't allow me to assign the following users: skudriavtsev.

Note that only kubernetes-sigs members, repo collaborators and people who have commented on this issue/PR can be assigned. Additionally, issues/PRs can only have 10 assignees at the same time.
For more information please see the contributor guide

In response to this:

/assign @skudriavtsev

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[k8s-ci-robot]

@snorwin: PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[snorwin]

Fixed by #2890