-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
🐛Use k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/json to unmarshal in fakeclient #3208
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
troy0820
wants to merge
2
commits into
kubernetes-sigs:main
Choose a base branch
from
troy0820:troy0820/api-machinery-marshal
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lets please add a test for the issue, otherwise this will likely break again in the future
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[I might be mixing up stuff]
IIRC this is heavily aligned to the upstream client-go fake client and we want to avoid differences in behavior.
What is the upstream fake client doing here? (or is it not using the json package at all and this is just from additional code that we have here)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not seeing anything in client-go fakeclient where this would be present. I may be overlooking it but it seems they use
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/json
in client-go but not for the fakeclient. They are using instances ofencoding/json
to Marshal for the ApplyConfigurations.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sbueringer I think you are confusing this with json patch, I don't think there is any reason for upstream to do json encoding in the fake client. We need it because of edge cases like "Object gets stored and retrieved in different representations like unstructured/structure", that issue does not exist in upstream fake clients as they don't support that
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good, thx for the additional info!
I know that it's not the json patch case, was just wondering if it's a similar case