Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LC-416 added json logging for elk and setting mdc values #100

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kiratraynor
Copy link
Contributor

We are adding more logging to be able to be ingested by Elasticsearch. We decided that what would make the most sense is to create a separate json log file so it can easily be indexed and would not require any GROK. In addition, we want to know some values for everything single log so we are setting mdc values for run id, doc id, and stage name at the moment.

@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ private void checkForDoc() {
sendToIndexWithAccounting(batch.flushIfExpired());
return;
}

log.debug("Indexing Doc {}", doc.getId());
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the call to sendToIndexWithAccounting is not necessarily the time when the doc is sent to the search engine
batch.add(doc) will typically add the doc to a batch being built up, and return an empty list so the sendToIndexWithAccounting call is effectively a no-op
batch.add(doc) returns a non-empty list only in certain situations, like when the batch is full and ready to be flushed

@@ -122,6 +125,7 @@ private void publishInternal(Document document) throws Exception {
}

if (previousDoc.getId().equals(document.getId())) {
log.debug("Sending document.");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this clause isn't when we're sending the document
this clause is when we're "collapsing" the current document into the previous one because they had the same IDs

@@ -93,6 +94,7 @@ public PublisherImpl(Config config, PublisherMessenger messenger, String runId,

@Override
public void publish(Document document) throws Exception {
MDC.put("docId", document.getId());
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in local mode, the publisher will be running in one thread, some number of workers will be running in their own threads, and an indexer will be running in yet another thread. I don't think setting the docId in the MDC here will propagate the change to other threads where docId is needed, but even if it did, the propogated docId would be "right" for those other threads because everything is happening concurrently -- one doc3 might be published at the same time worker 1 is processing doc2 and the indexer is indexing doc1...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants