feat/icp #101
feat/icp #101
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request implements the Changes
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Warning Review ran into problems🔥 ProblemsErrors were encountered while retrieving linked issues. Errors (1)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
packages/kos/src/chains/mod.rs (2)
132-134: Consider making the error message more descriptive.
Right now, it just says "decode raw tx," which might be too generic. Including a short note about the context of the failure (e.g., hex decoding failed) can be more helpful for debugging.
135-137: Use a more informative error description.
Similarly, consider providing extra context or a hint on what/where the hash decode failed.packages/kos/src/chains/icp/mod.rs (3)
87-89: Refine error variant for JSON parsing.
Currently, JSON parse failures are mapped toChainError::DecodeHash. Consider adding a more specific variant (e.g.,DecodeJson) to differentiate JSON parsing failures from actual hash decoding failures.
107-109: Consider computing and setting the transaction hash if empty.
Right now, setting an emptytx_hashmight be suboptimal. If you have enough data to compute a transaction hash, it might be useful to do so here.
201-223: Add assertions to strengthen the test.
The current test logs the resulting signatures but doesn’t verify them. Consider asserting against an expected signature if determinism applies.Example:
let signed_tx = icp.sign_tx(pvk, tx).unwrap(); let sig_str = String::from_utf8(signed_tx.signature).unwrap(); +assert!(sig_str.contains("some_expected_value"), + "Signatures do not match expected content");
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
packages/kos/src/chains/icp/mod.rs(3 hunks)packages/kos/src/chains/mod.rs(3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: format
🔇 Additional comments (7)
packages/kos/src/chains/mod.rs (2)
62-63: Nice addition for specialized error handling.
These new enum variants provide clearer distinctions for decoding errors.
229-230: Consistent error mapping.
Assigning 24 and 25 to these new variants adheres to the numeric progression in this match block. Looks good.packages/kos/src/chains/icp/mod.rs (5)
79-83: Method signature and mutable transaction reference look appropriate.
Accepting a mutableTransactionparameter makes sense for modifying the object in-place.
94-99: Iterating over multiple hashes is a good approach.
The loop is straightforward, and each hash decode is handled with proper error propagation.
101-101: Good practice clearing the private key.
Zeroing out the key bytes helps avoid inadvertent memory leaks.
103-105: Signature encoding logic is clear.
Storing the signatures as JSON bytes is a simple approach for multiple partial signatures.
183-183: Importing custom Base64 decode is fine.
Ensure that no conflicting standard library or other crate usage is needed.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Tests