Android automatic refactor - ObsoleteLayoutParam #540
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
this pr only removes android:layout_alignParentBottom="true" from java/res/layout/input_stone_popup.xml and java/res/layout/keyboard_popup.xml . |
|
Indeed it only removes android:layout_alignParentBottom="true" from java/res/layout/input_stone_popup.xml and java/res/layout/keyboard_popup.xml. Does tags are supposed to be meaningless in the given context. The </org.pocketworkstation.pckeyboard.LatinKeyboardBaseView> is not part of this PR. I think it is a legacy tag since this PR was done back in 2017. Feel free to close this PR if it no longer makes sense. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi,
I am developing a tool to automatically refactor Android applications with the goal of improving energy efficiency.
This pull request has the changes generated while applying the rule "ObsoleteLayoutParam".
While developing your application's views you might be specifying attributes in a view's artefact that are not necessary due to the nature of its parent. In this PR, those attributes were replaced by a comment.
I have made a previous validation of the changes and they seem correct.
Unfortunately, this tool is not able keep the original whitespace of the files, so comparison without ignoring whitespace might be confusing.
Please consider the changes and let me know if you agree with them.
Best,
Luis