Skip to content

Limit the RNTuple backwards compatibility to podio 1.2 #413

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 7, 2025

Conversation

tmadlener
Copy link
Contributor

BEGINRELEASENOTES

  • Limit the RNTuple backwards compatibility checks to only run with ROOT 6.34.04 and podio 1.2

ENDRELEASENOTES

The file we download has been written with podio 1.2, and AIDASoft/podio#711 changes the storage details of the metadata for the podio RNTuple backend. Once that PR is merged we can update this file and change the conditions for this check again.

@jmcarcell
Copy link
Member

Maybe we should keep this PR open as a reminder? And then once 1.3 is ready we fix it. Otherwise the test will stop running and it would be possible for no one to notice.

@tmadlener tmadlener force-pushed the limit-rntuple-compat-tests branch 2 times, most recently from 174d767 to d25463b Compare May 7, 2025 14:29
@tmadlener
Copy link
Contributor Author

Merging this once CI has passed to unblock https://github.com/AIDASoft/podio/actions/runs/14727724869/job/41334334613?pr=711

This will momentarily not run the rntuple backwards compatibility checks, but pick them up again once podio has a 1.3 tag.

@tmadlener tmadlener force-pushed the limit-rntuple-compat-tests branch from d25463b to 8cd0f08 Compare May 7, 2025 14:45
@tmadlener tmadlener force-pushed the limit-rntuple-compat-tests branch from 8cd0f08 to b257950 Compare May 7, 2025 15:01
@tmadlener tmadlener merged commit e1e35f0 into main May 7, 2025
13 of 14 checks passed
@tmadlener tmadlener deleted the limit-rntuple-compat-tests branch May 7, 2025 15:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants