Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: implement OsSingleStarknetStorage::new the right way #157

Conversation

odesenfans
Copy link
Contributor

Problem: the implementation of this method was a stub.

Solution: port the Python implementation completely.

Issue Number: N/A

Type

  • feature
  • bugfix
  • dev (no functional changes, no API changes)
  • fmt (formatting, renaming)
  • build
  • docs
  • testing

Description

Breaking changes?

  • yes
  • no

Problem: the implementation of this method was a stub.

Solution: port the Python implementation completely.
@odesenfans odesenfans force-pushed the od/fix-os-single-starknet-storage-builder branch from 04674e8 to 547eb6d Compare April 15, 2024 13:34
Copy link
Collaborator

@notlesh notlesh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

async fn new() scares me a bit, but I understand why...

@odesenfans
Copy link
Contributor Author

Not a fan either, but for now let's stick to the Python implementation.

@odesenfans odesenfans merged commit 7397072 into keep-starknet-strange:main Apr 15, 2024
5 checks passed
@odesenfans odesenfans deleted the od/fix-os-single-starknet-storage-builder branch April 15, 2024 15:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants