-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 93
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(datasets): Add support for databricks-connect>=13.0
#352
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
20 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c605ac4
Made _get_spark support databricks-connect-v2
MigQ2 50ccdea
Update RELEASE
MigQ2 076283c
Added missing pyspark import
MigQ2 2a75679
Changed logic to check dbcoonnect
MigQ2 5229449
Merge branch 'main' into feat/databricks-connect-v2
MigQ2 960d175
Update dbconnect comment
MigQ2 ab8014c
Merge branch 'main' into feat/databricks-connect-v2
MigQ2 c9be8ae
Fix spark typo
MigQ2 3739db8
Merge branch 'main' into feat/databricks-connect-v2
MigQ2 8d3f9bc
Merge branch 'main' into feat/databricks-connect-v2
MigQ2 f477a5a
Updated tests
MigQ2 294aa0f
Merge branch 'main' into feat/databricks-connect-v2
MigQ2 c63de9f
Merge branch 'main' into feat/databricks-connect-v2
MigQ2 51aa788
Fix linters
MigQ2 da24dcc
Fix black linter
MigQ2 d9b80b0
Merge branch 'main' into feat/databricks-connect-v2
MigQ2 87e8378
Removed databricks-connect from test coverage
MigQ2 38fc88c
Black linter reformat
MigQ2 dbabb81
Merge branch 'main' into feat/databricks-connect-v2
noklam 10eb379
Update release notes
merelcht File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For even further improved compatibility, add
and replace this line with
RemoteSparkSession.builder.getOrCreate()
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks a lot for looking into this @cdkrot , super appreciated
Do you mean another try except? So the fallback waterfall would be:
I guess adding RemoteSparksession would helo adding support for non-Databricks Spark-connect sessions?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, my bad, the logic in code is good as is 👍. sql.SparkSession will figure out if it needs to create sql.SparkSession or connect.SparkSession.
Possibly it's best to rewrite the comments though. Essentially the only reason to fallback from dbconnect session creation to pyspark's is when first is not installed, since dbconnect switches to pyspark automatically based on environment.