Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 12, 2021. It is now read-only.

CI: Enable checkcommits #13

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 29, 2018

Conversation

jodh-intel
Copy link
Contributor

Require all PRs to contain a "Fixes #XXX" comment and a
"Signed-off-by:" comment.

Also necessitated adding a very minimal .travis.yml to
trigger checkcommits.

Fixes #12.

Signed-off-by: James O. D. Hunt [email protected]

@jodh-intel
Copy link
Contributor Author

See kata-containers/tests#7.

@liangchenye
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @jodh-intel , so we should open an issue before submitting a PR, wow about enhancement PRs like #15?

@jodh-intel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@liangchenye - currently, yes, you need an issue for all PRs. It's only a few clicks to create an issue and the idea is that you create the issue and get it assigned to yourself as soon as you start working on a change. That way, it's clear what is being worked on and by whom. This is important to keep track of "upcoming" features/fixes but also helps to avoid multiple people raising PRs for the same fix/feature. That scenario has actually happened more than once in Clear Containers! 😄

@liangchenye
Copy link
Contributor

@jodh-intel thanks, I'll open an issue and submit again.

@jodh-intel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @jcvenegas - could you review please?

@jcvenegas
Copy link
Member

jcvenegas commented Jan 25, 2018

lgtm

Approved with PullApprove

@jcvenegas
Copy link
Member

I see travis is still failing because #40 needs to be merged, but I check at the logs an checkcommits worked as expected.

Thank you!.

@devimc @bergwolf ping , can you review and merge it if are happy with this PR.

@bergwolf
Copy link
Member

Can you please rebase to pass CI now that #40 is merged?

Require all PRs to contain a "Fixes #XXX" comment and a
"Signed-off-by:" comment by running the central static checks script.

Note that the static checks script will detect if the repository
contains golang code and only run those checks if it does.

Fixes kata-containers#12.

Signed-off-by: James O. D. Hunt <[email protected]>
@jodh-intel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Branch updated.

@bergwolf
Copy link
Member

bergwolf commented Jan 29, 2018

lgtm

Approved with PullApprove

@jcvenegas jcvenegas merged commit 058cf5b into kata-containers:master Jan 29, 2018
Pennyzct added a commit to Pennyzct/osbuilder that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2019
For euleros, it has supported aarch64 starting from v2.3,
but here is the sad part, there existed bugs in their 2.3.x image,
this bug existed in both x86_64 and aarch64 image.
related issue euleros/euleros-docker-images/kata-containers#13
(euleros/euleros-docker-images#13) has been raised.

Fixes: kata-containers#320

Signed-off-by: Penny Zheng <[email protected]>
Pennyzct added a commit to Pennyzct/osbuilder that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2019
For euleros, it has supported aarch64 starting from v2.3,
but here is the sad part, there existed bugs in their 2.3.x image,
this bug existed in both x86_64 and aarch64 image.
related issue euleros/euleros-docker-images/kata-containers#13
(euleros/euleros-docker-images#13) has been raised.

Fixes: kata-containers#320

Signed-off-by: Penny Zheng <[email protected]>
marcov pushed a commit to marcov/kata-osbuilder that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2019
For euleros, it has supported aarch64 starting from v2.3,
but here is the sad part, there existed bugs in their 2.3.x image,
this bug existed in both x86_64 and aarch64 image.
related issue euleros/euleros-docker-images/kata-containers#13
(euleros/euleros-docker-images#13) has been raised.

Fixes: kata-containers#320

Signed-off-by: Penny Zheng <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants