Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New function 'detect_keys()' in replacement of old 'match_keys()' #22

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 1, 2021

Conversation

kamapu
Copy link
Owner

@kamapu kamapu commented Jan 1, 2021

This function was planned in order to overcome "speed issues" in the former match_keys() function and after this discussion provided some hints to use regex() in an optimized version.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 1, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #22 (f272461) into master (c16bcd2) will increase coverage by 49.41%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #22       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   31.09%   80.50%   +49.41%     
===========================================
  Files           5        5               
  Lines         119      118        -1     
===========================================
+ Hits           37       95       +58     
+ Misses         82       23       -59     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
R/detect_keys.R 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
R/print.R 100.00% <0.00%> (+100.00%) ⬆️
R/read_bib.R 100.00% <0.00%> (+100.00%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c16bcd2...1af114c. Read the comment docs.

Function 'detect_keys()' successfully implemented. Only README have to
be updated.
Pull request can be then closed
@kamapu kamapu merged commit 1af114c into master Jan 1, 2021
@kamapu kamapu deleted the match_keys branch January 9, 2021 11:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants