Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added an get request #20

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 6, 2024
Merged

Added an get request #20

merged 3 commits into from
May 6, 2024

Conversation

dhruvil-sheth30
Copy link
Collaborator

@CodiumAI-Agent /review

@dhruvil-sheth30
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@CodiumAI-Agent /review

@CodiumAI-Agent
Copy link

CodiumAI-Agent commented May 6, 2024

PR Review 🔍

(Review updated until commit c33f1c3)

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

2, because the PR involves a straightforward addition of a new GET route and minor changes in another file. The logic is simple and the changes are not extensive, making it relatively easy to review.

🧪 Relevant tests

No

⚡ Possible issues

Error Handling: The error handling in the new GET route could be improved by providing more specific error messages based on the type of error caught.

🔒 Security concerns

No

Code feedback:
relevant fileBackend/routes.js
suggestion      

Consider adding specific error logging for different types of exceptions to enhance debugging and maintenance. For example, you might want to log different messages or handle different types of errors differently. This can be achieved by checking the type of the error object and responding accordingly. [important]

relevant lineconsole.error(error);

relevant fileBackend/routes.js
suggestion      

It's a good practice to use HTTP status codes that accurately describe the outcome of API requests. For the catch block in your route, consider using more specific status codes depending on the error type. For instance, a 400 Bad Request for client-side errors, or 503 Service Unavailable if it's a service error. [important]

relevant lineres.status(500).json({ error: 'Internal server error' });

@dhruvil-sheth30 dhruvil-sheth30 merged commit b182c94 into main May 6, 2024
@CodiumAI-Agent
Copy link

Persistent review updated to latest commit c33f1c3

@dhruvil-sheth30 dhruvil-sheth30 linked an issue May 8, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@dhruvil-sheth30 dhruvil-sheth30 removed a link to an issue May 8, 2024
@dhruvil-sheth30 dhruvil-sheth30 linked an issue May 8, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

GET Request
2 participants