Skip to content

read_up_to() #58

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 4, 2025
Merged

read_up_to() #58

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 4, 2025

Conversation

jwodder
Copy link
Owner

@jwodder jwodder commented Apr 4, 2025

Closes #54.

@jwodder jwodder added the enhancement New feature or request therefor label Apr 4, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 4, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 92.59259% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 87.51%. Comparing base (a2e0355) to head (ed7ac76).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/io/read_up_to.rs 92.59% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #58      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.45%   87.51%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files          34       35       +1     
  Lines        2184     2211      +27     
==========================================
+ Hits         1910     1935      +25     
- Misses        274      276       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jwodder jwodder merged commit 521dc82 into master Apr 4, 2025
11 checks passed
@jwodder jwodder deleted the gh-54 branch April 4, 2025 14:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request therefor
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add a function that reads up to n bytes from a Read, returning fewer only on EOF
1 participant