-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 145
Specifying Result Structures
Now that you know how each individual record is read, it's time to look at the different ways to read the results of a query.
Reading a single object:
Beer beer = connection.Single<Beer>("GetABeer");
Reading a list of objects:
IList<Beer> beer = connection.Query<Beer>("GetAListOfeer");
Reading two lists of objects:
var results = connection.QueryResults<Beer, Glass>("GetAllBeersAndAllGlasses");
IList<Beer> beers = results.Set1;
IList<Glass> glasses = results.Set2;
You can return up to 16 sets of objects this way.
This is equivalent to:
connection.Query("GetABeerAndProperGlass", Parameters.Empty,
Query.Returns(Some<Beer>.Records)
.Then(Some<Glass>.Records);
Keep an eye on Query.Returns. It gets pretty powerful.
Reading a list of objects with a one-to-one mapping:
IList<Beer> beers = connection.Query<Beer, Glass>("GetABeerAndProperGlass");
Beer beer = beers.First();
Glass glass = beer.Glass;
This is equivalent to:
connection.Query("GetABeerAndProperGlass", Parameters.Empty,
Query.Returns(OneToOne<Beer, Glass>.Records);
Insight will automatically split each record into Beer objects and Glass objects, then assemble them properly.
If you almost always return two objects together, you can put a RecordsetAttribute
on the class, so Insight will always try to read in the subobject. It's ok if the subobject isn't there.
[Recordset(typeof(Beer), typeof(Glass))]
class Beer { ... }
For further information on the mechanics of One-To-One relationships, see Record Readers.
Here's where we start to get tricky. For anything advanced, we need to specify the structure that the query returns:
CREATE PROC GetBeerAndPossibleGlasses AS
SELECT * FROM Beer
SELECT b.BeerID, g.* FROM Beer JOIN Glasses ON (...)
class Beer
{
public int ID;
public IList<Glass> Glasses;
}
var results = connection.Query("GetBeerAndPossibleGlasses", Parameters.Empty,
Query.Returns(Some<Beer>.Records)
.ThenChildren(Some<Glasses>.Records);
Now Insight knows that you want a list of beer records, each with a list of glasses that match.
Insight will assume that the Beer
class has an ID field, and that the first column in the glasses query is the Beer ID. Then it will break up the glasses into lists and assign them into your Beer objects.
To determine the ID field of a parent object, Insight uses the following order of precedence:
- The field(s) explicitly requested in the structure definition's id parameter.
- The field(s) on the parent class marked with the [RecordId] attribute.
- A field called "ID".
- A field called "_ID", e.g. Beer_ID for class Beer. (v5.2+)
- A field called "ID", e.g. BeerID for class Beer. (v5.2+)
- A field ending in "_ID", e.g. Brewski_ID for class Beer. (v5.1.1+)
- A field ending in "ID", e.g. BrewskiID. for class Beer.
To determine the parent's ID field in a child object, Insight uses the following order of precedence:
- The field(s) explicitly requested in the structure definition's GroupBy clause.
- The field(s) on the class marked with the
[ParentRecordId]
attribute. - A field called "ParentID".
- A field ending in "_ParentID".
- A field ending in "ParentID".
- A set of field(s) that have the same name(s) as the ID fields in the parent class.
- If none of the above, assume the fields are not in the child class, and grab enough hidden fields to match the number of fields in the Parent class's ID field.
To determine the target list field, Insight uses the following order of precedence:
- The field explicitly requested in the structure definition.
- The field on the class marked with the
[ChildRecords]
attribute that matches the type of the list. - Any field matching the type of the list.
- Any field matching the type of the child object. In this case, only a single record is read from the child recordset.
The list field/property can be any of the following types:
- IList
- IEnumerable
- ICollection
- List
- T - in this case, only a single record is read from the child recordset.
If Insight doesn't guess the ID field or list field right, you can tell it with attributes.
Here, we use Beer.ID as the parent key, an anonymous column for the Glass key, and put the glasses into Glasses:
class Beer
{
[RecordId] public int ID;
[ChildRecords] public IList<Glass> Glasses;
}
Here, we auto-detect Beer.ID as the parent key, use Glass.BeerID the Glass key, and put the glasses into Glasses:
class Beer
{
public int ID;
public IList<Glass> Glasses;
}
class Glass
{
[ParentRecordId]
public int BeerID;
public IList<Glass> Glasses;
}
Or you can tell it with hints on the query:
var results = connection.Query("GetBeerAndPossibleGlasses", Parameters.Empty,
Query.Returns(Some<Beer>.Records)
.ThenChildren(
Some<Glasses>.Records,
id: beer => beer.ID,
into: (beer, glass) => beer.Glasses = glass);
For interfaces, you can add hints on the Recordset attribute:
public interface IHaveStructure
{
[Recordset(1, typeof(Glass), ID="ID", GroupBy="BeerID", Into="Glasses")]
IList<Beer>GetBeerAndChildren();
}
Here:
* ID = parent id fields.
* GroupBy = child id fields.
* Into = the list field.
Other Notes:
- When specifying One-To-One structures, column order matters. See Record Readers for details.
- The way it's coded, it's possible for more than one parent to have a given ID, so it's actually possible to return many-to-many mappings. Woot.
You can also match objects that have composite keys:
Here, we use attributes to specify Beer.ID1/ID2 as the parent key, use Glass.ID1/ID2 the Glass key, and put the glasses into Glasses:
class Beer
{
[RecordId(0)] public int ID1;
[RecordId(1)] public int ID2;
public IList<Glass> Glasses;
}
class Glass
{
[ParentRecordId(0)] public int BeerID1;
[ParentRecordId(1)] public int BeerID2;
}
Or you can tell it with hints on the query:
var results = connection.Query("GetBeerAndPossibleGlasses", Parameters.Empty,
Query.Returns(Some<Beer>.Records)
.ThenChildren(
Some<Glasses>.Records.GroupBy(g => Tuple.Create(g.BeerID1, g.BeerID2)),
id: beer => Tuple.Create(beer.ID1, beer.ID2),
into: (beer, glass) => beer.Glasses = glass);
For interfaces, you can add the hints on the Recordset attribute:
public interface IHaveStructure
{
[Recordset(1, typeof(Glass), ID="ID1,ID2", GroupBy="BeerID1,BeerID2", Into="Glasses")]
IList<Beer>GetBeerAndChildren();
}
Here:
* ID = parent id fields.
* GroupBy = child id fields.
* Into = the list field.
If you omit GroupBy or id, Insight will try to guess at the columns to use for matching.
Some notes:
- Hints on the query have the highest precedence.
- For hints on the query, you can use any comparable object for the composite key, but it's generally easiest to use Tuple.
- If you don't specify a hint or attribute for the child class, Insight will assume that the number and type of key columns match the parent class, but will store them outside the child class when grouping the objects. In this case, the key fields need to be the first columns in the child recordset.
- If you want to use the members of the child class, use the ParentRecordId hint or the GroupBy construct. In this case, the key columns can be in any position in the child recordset.
You can mix and match Then
and ThenChildren
and also OneToMany
records. Using these pieces, you can make almost any structure out of your data.
This is getting a little crazy, but it's not icky at all! Returning 4 recordsets, with two parents and two children!
Results<Beer, Wine> results = c.QuerySql(
@" SELECT * FROM Beer WHERE Type="IPA"
SELECT b.ID, g.* FROM Glasses g JOIN RightGlass(...) ...
SELECT * FROM Wine WHERE Type="IPA"
SELECT w.ID, g.* FROM Glasses g JOIN RightGlass(...) ...",
parameters,
Query.Returns(Some<Beer>.Records)
.ThenChildren(Some<Glass>.Records)
.Then(Some<Wine>.Records);
.ThenChildren(Some<Glass>.Records)
You can also handle hierarchies that have more than two levels. In this case, you'll have to use the parents
hint on the ThenChildren method.
class Order
{
public int OrderID { get; set; }
public string Waitress { get; set; }
public int TableNumber { get; set; }
public List<Sampler> Samplers { get; set; }
}
class Sampler
{
public int SamplerID { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public List<Beer> Beers { get; set; }
}
class Beer
{
...
}
This can be handled with three recordsets:
SELECT Order.*
SELECT OrderID, Sampler.*
SELECT SamplerID, Beer.*
And now we tell Insight that the last two recordsets are children, and we tell it that the Beer goes into Samplers.
var results = c.Query(proc, params, Query.Returns(Some<Order>.Records)
.ThenChildren(Some<Sampler>Records)
.ThenChildren(Some<Beer>.Records,
parents: o => o.Samplers,
id: s => s.SamplerID);
With this extension method, after reading all of the Orders and Samplers, Insight will gather up all of the Samplers and attempt to assign the Beers into the Samplers.
This is a special case where you have a single parent record, and you want to put the next recordset as children all into the parent.
This can be handled with the query below. Note that we do NOT return the parent ID in the second recordset. Insight assumes that all of the children go into the parent.
SELECT Order.* FROM Order WHERE ID=1
SELECT Sampler.* FROM Sampler...
Now we use the SingleReader
to get a single record, and the ThenChildren
extension method to put the children in it:
var results = c.Query(proc, params,
Query.ReturnsSingle<Order>()
.ThenChildren(Some<Sampler>.Records);
From version 6.2.4 onwards, Insight allows the construction of a Parent, Child relationship using a single result set using the Together clause, given the following query:
SELECT o.*, s.*
FROM Order o
INNER JOIN Sampler s
ON o.OrderId = s.OrderId
WHERE OrderId=1
We can populate both the Order poco and the Sampler poco using the following clause:
using Insight.Database.Structure //We need this namespace to use Together
var results = c.Query(proc, params,
Query.Returns(Together<Order, Sampler>.Records));
Insight will split by the Parent Id, the records (in this scenario OrderId).
Customizing Object Mapping - BACK || NEXT- Record Readers
- Home
- About
- Getting Started
- Connections
- Execute
- Getting Results
- Advanced Results & Mapping
- Insert/Update Considerations
- Data Types
- Write Even Less Code
- Performance & Speed
- Other Topics
- Supported Databases
- Working with the Code