Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Fix ICE consent checks. #2058

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 3, 2023
Merged

Conversation

bgrozev
Copy link
Member

@bgrozev bgrozev commented Oct 2, 2023

chore: Update ice4j kotlin to 1.9

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 2, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #2058 (13e4523) into master (30dcf51) will increase coverage by 0.06%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #2058      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     42.48%   42.54%   +0.06%     
- Complexity     1663     1666       +3     
============================================
  Files           325      325              
  Lines         17142    17151       +9     
  Branches       2239     2239              
============================================
+ Hits           7282     7297      +15     
+ Misses         9153     9148       -5     
+ Partials        707      706       -1     

see 76 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 30dcf51...13e4523. Read the comment docs.

chore: Update ice4j kotlin to 1.9
@bgrozev bgrozev merged commit 63849ed into jitsi:master Oct 3, 2023
4 checks passed
@bgrozev bgrozev deleted the fix-consent-checks branch May 23, 2024 13:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants