-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 55
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Log BWE stats in a compatible with Medooze stats viewer #155
Open
JonathanLennox
wants to merge
7
commits into
jitsi:master
Choose a base branch
from
JonathanLennox:medooze-compatible-bwe-stats
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+413
−72
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3e795ea
Create a BandwidthEstimator.PacketStats class for BWE information abo…
JonathanLennox 37ae105
Populate isRtx in TransportCcEngine.mediaPacketSent.
JonathanLennox 88ec9ba
Populate isProbing in TransportCcEngine.mediaPacketSent.
JonathanLennox 9cf7902
Script to convert the BWE timeseries log to the form accepted by medo…
JonathanLennox 9591c56
Add a feedbackComplete interface to BandwidthEstimator.
JonathanLennox 917e4e5
Prune some unused code in timeseries conversion script.
JonathanLennox f60d94c
Update some commewnts in bwe-timeseries-to-medooze.pl.
JonathanLennox File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i am a bit worried about
PacketInfo
1) becoming a dumping ground for fields and, more fundamentally, holding data that doesn't really apply to all packets (true, marking an audio packet or sctp packet asisProbing = false
is technically accurate, but it still feels a bit wrong). i don't think this change along ruins things terribly, but i worry about the precedent. i'm probably being a bit too paranoid and if we don't think it's too bad it's something we could wait to address down the line should it become a problem.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would making a
VideoPacketInfo
subclass be helpful?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought about that, but wondered what sort of guarantees we could make as to when one would actually be used. For example, would we convert it on the ingress as well when we discovered a packet was video? Or would it only be in certain places? Also, if we were going to do this we'd have to test and cast it, but at that point would it be that much different than just testing and casting the underlying packet? If not, then maybe we could just do different packet types to denote probing?