minor: Update dependencies and refactor code structure #944
Conversation
Wraith CI 👻 Retry RequestCheck the box to re-trigger CI.
|
WalkthroughThis pull request encompasses a series of updates across multiple files in a SvelteKit AWS adapter project. The changes primarily involve dependency updates, code formatting improvements, and a significant migration towards Svelte 5's new reactivity model. The modifications span configuration files, TypeScript type definitions, and Svelte components, focusing on modernizing the codebase and improving code structure. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Dev as Developer
participant Svelte as Svelte Framework
participant Component as Counter Component
Dev->>Svelte: Update to Svelte 5
Svelte->>Component: Introduce new reactivity primitives
Component->>Component: Use $state(), $derived(), $effect()
Component-->>Svelte: Modernized reactive behavior
Possibly related PRs
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (8)
packages/site/src/routes/Counter.svelte (2)
6-7: Adopt consistent code style for new class instantiations.
Initializenew Spring(0)consistently (e.g., in-line or in a separate function). This helps readability, especially if more advanced configuration is needed later.
33-35: Clarify the displayed calculation.
You’re usingMath.floor(displayed_count.current + 1)andMath.floor(displayed_count.current). Make sure the offset includes the intended behavior for the user interface if the user anticipates integer increments.packages/adapter/src/types/AdapterOptions.ts (2)
1-1: Organize imports consistently.
Theimport { aws_lambda } from 'aws-cdk-lib'was moved. Confirm that this matches any lint or style guidelines.
110-110: AllowingunknownforlambdaModifierbroadens flexibility.
By acceptingunknown, you’re forgoing any type checks. Document or restrict the usage in further code if needed, to maintain clarity.packages/site/src/routes/sverdle/+page.svelte (4)
7-13: Migration fromexport let datato destructuring$props().
This approach avoids polluting the top-level scope but can sometimes reduce clarity for new contributors. Document your usage.
28-28: Usage of$state({})forclassnames.
Confirm that$stateis the desired approach. Plain objects might suffice if there's no significant advantage from the new reactivity here.
34-34: Usage of$state({})fordescription.
Same note as above. Make sure this is necessary given the usage pattern.
Line range hint
36-55: Efficient re-initialization in$effect.
Reassigningclassnamesanddescriptionto empty objects within$effectis fine but can cause re-rendering. You might want to track changes more selectively to avoid potential performance overhead.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
cdk/arch/lambda-s3.ts(2 hunks)cdk/external/cdk-modifiers.ts(1 hunks)cf2/src/index.ts(0 hunks)package.json(3 hunks)packages/adapter/src/steps/setup.ts(2 hunks)packages/adapter/src/types/AdapterOptions.ts(3 hunks)packages/site/package.json(1 hunks)packages/site/src/routes/+layout.svelte(2 hunks)packages/site/src/routes/Counter.svelte(3 hunks)packages/site/src/routes/sverdle/+page.svelte(5 hunks)packages/site/svelte.config.js(1 hunks)packages/site/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- cf2/src/index.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
- packages/site/svelte.config.js
- cdk/arch/lambda-s3.ts
- packages/adapter/src/steps/setup.ts
- packages/site/tsconfig.json
- cdk/external/cdk-modifiers.ts
🔇 Additional comments (21)
packages/site/src/routes/+layout.svelte (2)
5-6: Use caution when explicitly destructuring $props().
In newer SvelteKit versions, referencing $props() might change in the future. Although valid for now, consider referencing the official docs to ensure long-term compatibility.
18-18: Confirm that {@render children()} is intended to replace <slot/>.
Rendering via {@render ...} changes the default slot approach. Verify that all children are properly rendered compared to using <slot>.
packages/site/src/routes/Counter.svelte (6)
2-2: Check if the Spring import is used consistently.
You imported { Spring } from svelte/motion. Ensure it's the correct class for the new reactivity approach and that any old usage was removed.
4-4: Validate $state(0) usage.
$state(0) implies an experimental approach to reactivity. Confirm that your SvelteKit version supports this feature and that your build environment is configured accordingly.
8-10: Good job using $effect to manage spring updates.
Using $effect(() => { displayed_count.set(count) }) is straightforward and clean. Make sure to handle any potential race conditions if other effects also update count.
12-12: Proper usage of $derived(...).
Be mindful that $derived(...) usage may differ or evolve. Validate that modulo(displayed_count.current, 1) correctly updates in all scenarios.
21-21: Ensure the decrement logic matches user expectations.
You changed the approach to handle reactivity. Double-check negative bounds or any edge cases where a negative count might cause undesired behavior.
39-39: Confirm increment button logic.
Similar to the decrement button, confirm that incrementing beyond certain values (e.g., a maximum) is handled gracefully.
packages/adapter/src/types/AdapterOptions.ts (1)
94-94: Keep docstring in sync with code usage.
The docstring references how code can “access types.” Confirm that the newly introduced or reorganized imports still align with that documentation.
packages/site/src/routes/sverdle/+page.svelte (6)
3-3: Re-import of confetti is correct.
Verify the new import order does not affect the confetti animation logic.
16-16: Check $derived(...) consistency.
won = $derived(data.answers.at(-1) === 'xxxxx') might not react if data.answers changes. Confirm that $derived triggers as intended whenever data.answers updates.
19-19: Edge case handling for i = $derived(...).
Make sure negative indexing or out-of-bound scenarios are correctly handled if won or data.answers changes unpredictably.
22-22: Ensure reactivity for submittable = $derived(...).
Check that data.guesses[i] is always defined. If i is out of range, this might break the conditional.
162-165: Handle default prevention in inline arrow functions carefully.
The explicit e.preventDefault() is fine, but ensure you do not block needed events (e.g., form submissions) unintentionally.
210-210: Use of confetti for “won” state.
Switching from a self-closing tag to a standard closing tag is correct for the directive. Test on various screen sizes to ensure proper display.
packages/site/package.json (3)
9-9: Format script simplified
The format script has been updated from @jill64/psx to psvx.
12-12: Verify compatibility between @jill64/eslint-config-svelte and @sveltejs/kit
The ESLint config has been updated to 2.0.2 along with @sveltejs/kit 2.15.1.
Run this verification script:
Also applies to: 16-16
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the actual Svelte version in the project to ensure compatibility.
✓ Dependencies are compatible
The compatibility check shows that:
@jill64/[email protected]requiressvelte: ^4.0.0 || ^5.0.0- Project uses
svelte: 5.16.0 @sveltejs/[email protected]requiressvelte: ^4.0.0 || ^5.0.0-next.0
All version requirements are satisfied, ensuring compatibility between the ESLint config and the SvelteKit setup.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any peer dependency requirements
npm info @jill64/[email protected] peerDependencies
npm info @sveltejs/[email protected] peerDependencies
Length of output: 281
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the Svelte version in package.json
rg '"svelte":\s*"[^"]*"' packages/site/package.json
Length of output: 77
18-20:
The update to Svelte 5 (4.2.19 -> 5.16.0) introduces significant changes to the reactivity model and requires careful migration. Additionally, Vite 6 and its Svelte plugin have been updated to match.
Key considerations:
- Svelte 5 introduces breaking changes in the reactivity system
- Vite 6 may have compatibility requirements
Please ensure:
- The codebase has been migrated to use Svelte 5's new reactivity model
- All components have been tested with the new versions
- The versions are compatible with each other
Run this verification script:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the analysis of the Svelte files in the codebase, I can see that the code is already using Svelte 5's new reactivity syntax with $state, $derived, $effect, and $props. The codebase appears to have been properly migrated to use Svelte 5's new reactivity model, as evidenced by:
- Usage of
$statefor reactive state declarations:
let classnames: Record<string, 'exact' | 'close' | 'missing'> = $state({})- Usage of
$derivedfor computed values:
let won = $derived(data.answers.at(-1) === 'xxxxx')- Usage of
$effectfor side effects:
$effect(() => {
classnames = {}
description = {}
// ...
})- Usage of
$propsfor component props:
let { children } = $props()✓ The codebase is compatible with Svelte 5's reactivity model
The code has been properly migrated to use Svelte 5's new reactivity system and appears to be using the latest features correctly. The version updates in package.json are appropriate and compatible with each other.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for Svelte 5 specific syntax and potential migration issues
ast-grep --pattern 'let $name = $value' # Old reactivity syntax
ast-grep --pattern '$: $expr' # Reactive statements that might need updates
Length of output: 73
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for Svelte files and their content
fd -e svelte -x cat {} \;
# Also check for any migration guides or documentation
fd -g "*MIGRATION*.md" -g "*UPGRADING*.md" -g "README.md" -x cat {} \;
Length of output: 20140
package.json (3)
4-4: Version bump to 1.10.0 appears appropriate
The version increment from 1.9.71 to 1.10.0 follows semver for new features without breaking changes.
35-35: Repository image URL updated
The change is cosmetic and doesn't affect functionality.
62-62: Verify compatibility of development dependencies
Several development dependencies have been updated:
- @jill64/eslint-config-ts: 1.1.44 -> 2.0.1 (major)
- @sveltejs/kit: 2.13.0 -> 2.15.1 (minor)
- @playwright/test: 1.47.2 -> 1.49.1 (minor)
- cf2-builder: 1.1.24 -> 1.1.29 (patch)
Run this verification script:
Also applies to: 65-65, 67-67, 68-68
✅ Verification successful
Dependencies update appears compatible and safe
Based on the verification results:
- The project correctly uses
@jill64/eslint-config-tsin both root and embed configurations, and the update to 2.0.1 appears safe as the ESLint configuration is properly structured. - The SvelteKit dependency update (2.13.0 -> 2.15.1) is a minor version change and the project's peerDependency requirement (
"@sveltejs/kit": "^2.0.0") remains satisfied. - The codebase's SvelteKit imports are using standard, stable APIs (Server, Adapter, Builder, fail) that are unlikely to be affected by minor version changes.
- The TypeScript configurations are properly set up and compatible with the updated dependencies.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any breaking changes in major version updates
npm info @jill64/[email protected] peerDependencies
# Verify TypeScript compatibility
ast-grep --pattern 'import type { $_ } from "@sveltejs/kit"'
Length of output: 121
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to check dependencies and imports
# Check package.json for dependencies and their versions
cat package.json
# Search for any SvelteKit imports in the codebase
rg -l "@sveltejs/kit"
# Search for ESLint configuration files
fd -e .eslintrc -e .eslintrc.js -e .eslintrc.json -e .eslintrc.cjs
# Check TypeScript configuration
fd tsconfig.json
Length of output: 3229
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the ESLint configuration and TypeScript setup
# Check the root ESLint configuration
cat .eslintrc.* 2>/dev/null || echo "No root ESLint config found"
# Check the content of tsconfig files
cat tsconfig.json
cat packages/adapter/tsconfig.json
# Check the actual usage of @jill64/eslint-config-ts in the codebase
rg "@jill64/eslint-config-ts" -A 5 -B 5
# Let's also check the SvelteKit imports to verify compatibility
rg "from '@sveltejs/kit'" -A 2 -B 2
rg 'from "@sveltejs/kit"' -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 4648
| onclick={(e) => { | ||
| e.preventDefault() | ||
| update(e) | ||
| }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Repeated logic in onclick handlers.
Potential duplication in the arrow function blocks for each key press. Consider extracting a shared function if the logic grows further.
Upgrade dependencies, improve code formatting, and refactor lambda modifier implementation for better clarity and functionality.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Refactor
Style
Chores
Tests
The release primarily focuses on internal improvements to the project's code structure, dependency management, and Svelte component implementation.