Implemented qrcode and added hash to encryption #48
Conversation
godchiSymbionix
requested review from
BMartinos,
yassinedorbozgithub and
jacob-khoza-symb
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new QR code generation feature in the application, along with enhancements to security by adding hashed fields for sensitive data. A new API endpoint is created to generate QR codes for specific SHLinks, supported by a corresponding DTO for request data. The database schema is updated with new fields to store hashed passcodes, and unit tests are added to ensure the functionality works as expected. Additionally, a utility function is made accessible for broader use within the application. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant API
participant Service
participant Database
Client->>API: POST /api/v1/share-links/:id/qrcode
API->>Service: Validate ID and Token
Service->>Database: Retrieve SHLink by ID
Database-->>Service: Return SHLink
Service->>API: Generate QR Code
API-->>Client: Return QR Code Image
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Files selected for processing (1)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
package.json (1)
30-30: LGTM! The addition of theqrcodelibrary aligns with the PR objectives.The
qrcodelibrary is a good choice for implementing QR code generation functionality in the application. Its addition aligns with the stated PR objectives and the AI-generated summary.Please ensure that the QR code generation feature is thoroughly tested, covering various scenarios and edge cases.
As an additional suggestion, consider using a more strict version constraint like
~1.5.4instead of^1.5.4to prevent unintended updates that might introduce breaking changes. However, this is a minor nitpick and the current version constraint is acceptable.src/mappers/shlink-mapper.ts (1)
Line range hint
99-108: LGTM, but consider the implications of exporting the function.The code changes are approved.
However, please note that exporting the
encodeSHLinkfunction makes it part of the module's public API. This means that any future changes to the function could potentially break other parts of the codebase that depend on it.Consider the following:
- Carefully evaluate if exporting the function is necessary. Only export it if you intend it to be used by other modules.
- If you do export the function, make sure to document its usage and contract (input/output types, expected behavior, edge cases, etc.) so that other developers know how to use it correctly.
- Be cautious when making changes to exported functions in the future, as they could be breaking changes. If necessary, consider versioning your module's API to handle breaking changes gracefully.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (8)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- prisma/migrations/20240911113019_test/migration.sql (1 hunks)
- prisma/schema.prisma (2 hunks)
- prisma/schema.test.prisma (1 hunks)
- src/app/api/v1/share-links/[id]/qrcode/route.test.ts (1 hunks)
- src/app/api/v1/share-links/[id]/qrcode/route.ts (1 hunks)
- src/domain/dtos/shlink-qrcode.ts (1 hunks)
- src/mappers/shlink-mapper.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (10)
src/domain/dtos/shlink-qrcode.ts (1)
1-3: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
prisma/migrations/20240911113019_test/migration.sql (1)
1-2: LGTM!The migration looks good. It adds a new column
config_passcode_hashof typeTEXTto theshlinktable, which aligns with the PR objective of adding hashed fields for sensitive data.src/app/api/v1/share-links/[id]/qrcode/route.ts (1)
18-47: LGTM!The GET function is well-structured and follows good practices:
- It handles the case when the id is not provided by returning a 404 response.
- It uses the getSingleSHLinkUseCase function to retrieve the SHLink, separating the use case logic from the API route handler.
- It returns a 404 response if the SHLink is not found, which is the appropriate status code for a not found resource.
- It uses the encodeSHLink function to encode the SHLink data before generating the QR code, keeping the encoding logic separate from the route handler.
- It generates the QR code using the QRCode.toDataURL function, which is a commonly used library for generating QR codes.
- It returns the QR code data URL in the JSON response with a 200 status code, which is the appropriate status code for a successful response.
- It catches any errors and passes them to the handleApiValidationError function, handling errors centrally.
The code changes are approved.
src/app/api/v1/share-links/[id]/qrcode/route.test.ts (4)
30-53: LGTM!The test case for the happy path scenario looks good. It mocks the required dependencies, makes the API call with valid inputs, and verifies the response status and body.
55-64: LGTM!The test case for the missing ID scenario looks good. It makes the API call without the ID and verifies the 404 response status and message.
66-76: LGTM!The test case for the scenario where the SHLink is not found looks good. It mocks the
getSingleSHLinkUseCaseto return null, makes the API call, and verifies the 404 response status and message.
78-92: LGTM!The test case for the error handling scenario looks good. It mocks the
getSingleSHLinkUseCaseto throw an error, makes the API call, and verifies that thehandleApiValidationErroris called with the error. It also verifies the 500 response status.prisma/schema.test.prisma (1)
48-48: LGTM!The addition of the
config_passcode_hashfield to store the hashed version of theconfig_passcodeis a good security practice. The@encryption:hash(config_passcode)annotation ensures that the passcode is hashed before storing it. Marking the field as optional is also correct as not all shlinks may have a passcode.The code changes are approved.
prisma/schema.prisma (2)
48-48: LGTM!The addition of the
config_passcode_hashfield to store a hashed version of theconfig_passcodeis a good security practice. It reduces the risk of exposure in case of a data breach.The
@encryption:hashattribute ensures that the value is automatically hashed when stored in the database.
82-82: LGTM!The addition of the
config_client_secret_hashfield to store a hashed version of theconfig_client_secretis a good security practice. It reduces the risk of exposure in case of a data breach.The
@encryption:hashattribute ensures that the value is automatically hashed when stored in the database.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
your migrations only show one change when you have two tables changed
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Security Enhancements
Tests
Documentation