Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue #25 Fix #3

Open
wants to merge 16 commits into
base: Issue25
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Issue #25 Fix #3

wants to merge 16 commits into from

Conversation

jeestr4d
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

takishida and others added 6 commits May 15, 2024 12:34
* Add l3out_overlapping_loopback_check

* Add IPv6 handling in class IPAddress

* ipv6_to_binary() as staticmethod

---------

Co-authored-by: gmonroy <[email protected]>
* invalid_fex_rs_check + tests

* docs + check doc link

* fix bugId in doc

* remove `check` from title
…n as port description in lldp instead of dn (#123)

* Added check for CSCwf00416 LLDP custom interface descriptions

* Added error handling if no tversion is given

* resolve review comments

---------

Co-authored-by: gmonroy <[email protected]>
@jeestr4d jeestr4d self-assigned this May 22, 2024
wilsonbc2 and others added 10 commits May 23, 2024 13:51
… empty or not explicitly matched (#128)

* Adding check for route-map community match CSCwb08081

* Fixed formatting for get_switch_version. Now displays version and adds newline character.

* rtmap_comm_match_defect_check now also checks for set statement in routemap. Fixed documentation.
* Issue #137: Added new check unsupported_fec_configuration_ex_check and updated validations.md

* Added unit tests for unsupported_fec_configuration_ex_check and changed cversion to sw_cversion

* Trimmed topSystem json for unit tests

* Fixed empty data test case and removed redundant boolean vars
* invalid_fex_rs_check; check fex_ id >= 101

* review changes
@monrog2 monrog2 deleted the branch jeestr4d:Issue25 August 12, 2024 16:03
@monrog2 monrog2 deleted the Issue25 branch August 12, 2024 16:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants