Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add Group.projects #494

Merged

Conversation

Granjow
Copy link
Contributor

@Granjow Granjow commented Nov 14, 2019

This commit also introduces a minimal typed response as a first step
towards #384.

@jdalrymple
Copy link
Owner

The only suggestion id have would be moving the interface information into the corresponding service, just for consistency.

@Granjow
Copy link
Contributor Author

Granjow commented Nov 16, 2019

@jdalrymple Yes, I did not do this because also other endpoints return the same structure, e.g. /api/v4/projects returns projects as well. But I could move it to servcies/Projects.ts and reference it from Groups.ts?

@Granjow
Copy link
Contributor Author

Granjow commented Nov 20, 2019

Anyone, can this MR be merged?

@jdalrymple
Copy link
Owner

Yea sorry! I though i responded 🤦‍♂️ I would move it into the Projects.js file!

This commit also introduces a minimal typed response as a first step
towards jdalrymple#384.
@Granjow Granjow force-pushed the feature/granjow/group-projects branch from 2c46fd3 to 6eef140 Compare November 20, 2019 14:49
@Granjow
Copy link
Contributor Author

Granjow commented Nov 20, 2019

@jdalrymple Updated! I suffixed the interface with Schema so people do not accidentially import Project instead of Projects.

@jdalrymple jdalrymple merged commit 9def4e7 into jdalrymple:master Nov 20, 2019
jdalrymple pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2019
# [11.6.0](11.5.1...11.6.0) (2019-11-20)

### Features

* Add Group.projects ([#494](#494)) ([9def4e7](9def4e7)), closes [#384](#384)
@jdalrymple
Copy link
Owner

🎉 This PR is included in version 11.6.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants