[WIP] Added support for extracting source code blocks (tangling) #193
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Without this fix, all #+BEGIN_* blocks are not correctly highlighted; this fix just allows whitespace to occur before the #+BEGIN blocks, which is quite common in documents.
- This feature needs emacs, though. - Updated documentation as well. - Tests do not yet work correctly...
|
Arrgh I just saw the last two commits were included also. Not sure why, they should be in the master branch already....! |
|
@Shurakai can you rebase your pull request? |
|
I don't see the problem here. His branch rebases fine on The title of the PR is tagged as What are the limitations of the current implementation? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Although this needs emacs, it is much better than nothing. Plus, with emacs we can also
use the noweb syntax.
The only problem I still have is with the tests... Not sure why it's not generating the file because
when I manually test it, it works. (I'm quite new to python, so any help is very much welcomed)