Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove apparently obsolete setup.cfg #220

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 2, 2023
Merged

Remove apparently obsolete setup.cfg #220

merged 1 commit into from
May 2, 2023

Conversation

bittner
Copy link
Member

@bittner bittner commented Jul 14, 2022

The setup.cfg file contains configuration data that used to be read by tools like Tox and Sphinx.

The respective values now appear in pyproject.toml and tox.ini, and it looks like the entire file is hence obsolete.

I'm not 100% sure whether ReadTheDocs reads the file, but I guess building the docs should work just fine without it.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 14, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #220 (e596e20) into main (248e04a) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #220   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.49%   94.49%           
=======================================
  Files          31       31           
  Lines        1344     1344           
=======================================
  Hits         1270     1270           
  Misses         74       74           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 248e04a...e596e20. Read the comment docs.

@bittner
Copy link
Member Author

bittner commented May 2, 2023

Please, anyone, review this PR, so we can merge it!

@jezdez @smithdc1 @PiDelport @jcassee

@jezdez jezdez merged commit 8d6419e into main May 2, 2023
@bittner bittner deleted the cleanup/setup-cfg branch May 2, 2023 08:24
@bittner
Copy link
Member Author

bittner commented May 2, 2023

Thanks Jannis!

@jezdez
Copy link
Member

jezdez commented May 2, 2023

@bittner NP, did you see that the CI system isn't working correctly?

@bittner
Copy link
Member Author

bittner commented May 2, 2023

@bittner NP, did you see that the CI system isn't working correctly?

Yes. I just described it in #226 (review).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants