Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

📝 Updated README #352

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 16, 2025
Merged

📝 Updated README #352

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 16, 2025

Conversation

devtobi
Copy link
Member

@devtobi devtobi commented Jan 16, 2025

Description

  • Updated README to be aligned with refarch-templates

Reference
Issues #351

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Enhanced README with new links and badges
    • Added project roadmap section
    • Improved navigation and clarity of project instructions
    • Updated references to Spring, VueJS, and project components
    • Added links to documentation, issues, milestones, and project boards

@devtobi devtobi requested a review from a team as a code owner January 16, 2025 12:34
@devtobi devtobi linked an issue Jan 16, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
2 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 16, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request focuses on enhancing the README.md file for the refarch project by introducing new links, badges, and improving documentation structure. The changes include adding reference links for issues, project resources, documentation, and external references. The README has been reformatted to provide clearer instructions, add a roadmap section, and improve overall navigation and visual appeal through strategically placed badges and consistent markdown formatting.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/README.md - Added multiple reference links for issues, documentation, and project resources
- Introduced new badges for documentation, new issues, license, and project love
- Reformatted component sections with consistent markdown styling
- Added a new "Roadmap" section
- Streamlined contributing instructions

Possibly related issues

  • [Documentation] Update README #351: Directly matches the objectives of this PR by requesting README updates, including shield updates, link migration, and contributing section improvements

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

documentation, readme-update, project-resources

Poem

🐰 A README so bright and clear,
Links and badges now appear!
Roadmaps bloom like springtime flowers,
Guiding devs through coding hours.
Open source with love, hooray! 🌟


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Type: Documentation The issue contains work for the documentation label Jan 16, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/README.md (1)

52-58: Consider these style improvements.

While the content is good, consider these refinements:

  • Add a hyphen in "open-source community"
  • Replace "amazing" with a more formal word like "valuable" or "enriching"
  • Simplify "that would make this better" to "for improvement"
  • Reduce the number of exclamation marks
-Contributions are what make the open source community such an amazing place to learn, inspire, and create.
+Contributions are what make the open-source community such a valuable place to learn, inspire, and create.

-If you have a suggestion that would make this better, please [open an issue][new-issue]
+If you have a suggestion for improvement, please [open an issue][new-issue]

-Don't forget to give the project a star! Thanks again!
+Don't forget to give the project a star. Thanks again.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~52-~52: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...buting Contributions are what make the open source community such an amazing place to lear...

(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)


[style] ~52-~52: Consider using a more formal and expressive alternative to ‘amazing’.
Context: ...hat make the open source community such an amazing place to learn, inspire, and create. An...

(AWESOME)


[style] ~54-~54: Consider using a shorter alternative to avoid wordiness.
Context: ...*. If you have a suggestion that would make this better, please [open an issue][new-issue] and ...

(MADE_IT_JJR)


[style] ~56-~56: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 4 exclamation marks for a text that’s 1731 characters long)
Context: ...to give the project a star! Thanks again! More about this in the [CODE_OF_CONDUC...

(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ceb583a and 925a01f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
.github/README.md

[uncategorized] ~52-~52: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...buting Contributions are what make the open source community such an amazing place to lear...

(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)


[style] ~52-~52: Consider using a more formal and expressive alternative to ‘amazing’.
Context: ...hat make the open source community such an amazing place to learn, inspire, and create. An...

(AWESOME)


[style] ~54-~54: Consider using a shorter alternative to avoid wordiness.
Context: ...*. If you have a suggestion that would make this better, please [open an issue][new-issue] and ...

(MADE_IT_JJR)


[style] ~56-~56: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 4 exclamation marks for a text that’s 1731 characters long)
Context: ...to give the project a star! Thanks again! More about this in the [CODE_OF_CONDUC...

(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: build-maven
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/README.md (4)

26-35: Great addition of badges and clear introduction!

The badges enhance visibility and provide quick access to key resources. The introduction clearly explains the project purpose and technology stack.


39-42: Well-structured component documentation!

The component list is clear and consistently formatted, with helpful links to both code and documentation.


44-48: Excellent addition of the roadmap section!

This section effectively guides users to project planning resources and development status.


62-66: Clear license and contact information!

The license and contact sections are well-formatted and provide essential information.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)

66-66: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)

.github/README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@simonhir simonhir left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@devtobi devtobi merged commit 9a68bd6 into main Jan 16, 2025
11 checks passed
@devtobi devtobi deleted the doc/351-documentation-update-readme branch January 16, 2025 12:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Type: Documentation The issue contains work for the documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Documentation] Update README
2 participants