-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
📝 Updated README #352
📝 Updated README #352
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request focuses on enhancing the README.md file for the refarch project by introducing new links, badges, and improving documentation structure. The changes include adding reference links for issues, project resources, documentation, and external references. The README has been reformatted to provide clearer instructions, add a roadmap section, and improve overall navigation and visual appeal through strategically placed badges and consistent markdown formatting. Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/README.md (1)
52-58
: Consider these style improvements.While the content is good, consider these refinements:
- Add a hyphen in "open-source community"
- Replace "amazing" with a more formal word like "valuable" or "enriching"
- Simplify "that would make this better" to "for improvement"
- Reduce the number of exclamation marks
-Contributions are what make the open source community such an amazing place to learn, inspire, and create. +Contributions are what make the open-source community such a valuable place to learn, inspire, and create. -If you have a suggestion that would make this better, please [open an issue][new-issue] +If you have a suggestion for improvement, please [open an issue][new-issue] -Don't forget to give the project a star! Thanks again! +Don't forget to give the project a star. Thanks again.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~52-~52: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...buting Contributions are what make the open source community such an amazing place to lear...(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)
[style] ~52-~52: Consider using a more formal and expressive alternative to ‘amazing’.
Context: ...hat make the open source community such an amazing place to learn, inspire, and create. An...(AWESOME)
[style] ~54-~54: Consider using a shorter alternative to avoid wordiness.
Context: ...*. If you have a suggestion that would make this better, please [open an issue][new-issue] and ...(MADE_IT_JJR)
[style] ~56-~56: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 4 exclamation marks for a text that’s 1731 characters long)
Context: ...to give the project a star! Thanks again! More about this in the [CODE_OF_CONDUC...(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/README.md
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
.github/README.md
[uncategorized] ~52-~52: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...buting Contributions are what make the open source community such an amazing place to lear...
(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)
[style] ~52-~52: Consider using a more formal and expressive alternative to ‘amazing’.
Context: ...hat make the open source community such an amazing place to learn, inspire, and create. An...
(AWESOME)
[style] ~54-~54: Consider using a shorter alternative to avoid wordiness.
Context: ...*. If you have a suggestion that would make this better, please [open an issue][new-issue] and ...
(MADE_IT_JJR)
[style] ~56-~56: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 4 exclamation marks for a text that’s 1731 characters long)
Context: ...to give the project a star! Thanks again! More about this in the [CODE_OF_CONDUC...
(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: build-maven
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/README.md (4)
26-35
: Great addition of badges and clear introduction!The badges enhance visibility and provide quick access to key resources. The introduction clearly explains the project purpose and technology stack.
39-42
: Well-structured component documentation!The component list is clear and consistently formatted, with helpful links to both code and documentation.
44-48
: Excellent addition of the roadmap section!This section effectively guides users to project planning resources and development status.
62-66
: Clear license and contact information!The license and contact sections are well-formatted and provide essential information.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)
66-66: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Description
refarch-templates
Reference
Issues #351
Summary by CodeRabbit