[Feature] Do not allow beta to override stable repository if both active

[GermanBluefox]

• Do not allow to be active together the stable and beta repositories.
• Allow addressing the repositories by index in the table

To avoid such a situation

Tests

• I have added tests to avoid a recursion of this bug
• It is not possible to test for this bug

Only CLI files changed

Documentation

• I have documented the new feature

[Apollon77]

What exactly is the point of working with index? This adds a lot of edge cases as you can see in the code you needed to add. In fact you can not assume any order anyway, so what exactly is the point here?

if it gets easier we could also not use a joined parameter "name/index" but use different comands that use index which makes it easier too

T

[GermanBluefox]

I still do not understand, If we have index, why not to use it instead of writing "my repo" ?
Same logic is used for restoring

[foxriver76]

I still do not understand, If we have index, why not to use it instead of writing "my repo" ? Same logic is used for restoring

Hm index is now supported? but of course not for add or addset just for setand del, as the index will just be the next free and you cannot specify like 100 out of nowhere. Or what is the problem now?