Add vignette on referential footnotes workaround

[edelarua]

Closes #176

[github-actions]

Code Coverage Summary

Filename                 Stmts    Miss  Cover    Missing
---------------------  -------  ------  -------  ----------------------------------------------------
R/paginate_listing.R        47       1  97.87%   101
R/rlistings_methods.R      101      14  86.14%   39, 54, 58, 140-143, 146, 230-236
R/rlistings.R              166      25  84.94%   158-161, 164-167, 206-210, 374-377, 381-384, 417-420
TOTAL                      314      40  87.26%

Diff against main

Filename      Stmts    Miss  Cover
----------  -------  ------  --------
TOTAL             0       0  +100.00%

Results for commit: 0d97b1e

Minimum allowed coverage is 80%

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results

[github-actions]

Unit Test Performance Difference

Test Suite	$Status$	Time on main	$±Time$	$±Tests$	$±Skipped$	$±Failures$	$±Errors$
export	💚	$2.64$	$-1.22$	$0$	$0$	$0$	$0$
paginate_listing	💚	$4.72$	$-2.21$	$0$	$0$	$0$	$0$

Results for commit 12fc835

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

Unit Tests Summary

  1 files    4 suites   5s ⏱️
32 tests 25 ✔️ 7 💤 0 ❌
80 runs  71 ✔️ 9 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 0d97b1e.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[shajoezhu]

Hi @edelarua , it looks nice. Though with content I have a few proposals.

1. Use the first 25 rows of the ex_adae data
2. Make arm column as the first column
3. use "Analysis Start Relative Day" $ASTDY variable, and adding footnotes to it.
4. Footnotes as "* Study day derived from imputed onset date. \n** Duration derived from imputed onset date and/or end date."

Consider this example

aa = adae[c("USUBJID", "ASTDY")]
aa$ASTDY[3] = paste0(aa$ASTDY[3], "*")
as.factor(aa$ASTDY)

you will see

[1] 251  304  497* 608  259  303  493  600  635  730  22   181  702  48   200  392  403  39   65  
[20] 95   160  292  460  470  476 
25 Levels: 160 181 200 22 251 259 292 303 304 39 392 403 460 470 476 48 493 497* 600 608 635 ... 95

you will need to manipulate the date such it is sorted by values, e.g.

22 39 95 48 95 160 ... 493 497* 600 608 635

So when display, you can sort this column by its levels

[shajoezhu]

hi @edelarua , it looks really good! Thanks. made some minor suggestions

[shajoezhu]

Brilliant! Thanks a lot Em!