Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding n to the proportion_ci*() results #260

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 10, 2025
Merged

Adding n to the proportion_ci*() results #260

merged 5 commits into from
Feb 10, 2025

Conversation

ddsjoberg
Copy link
Collaborator

@ddsjoberg ddsjoberg commented Feb 10, 2025

What changes are proposed in this pull request?

Reference GitHub issue associated with pull request. e.g., 'closes #'
closes #256


Pre-review Checklist (if item does not apply, mark is as complete)

  • All GitHub Action workflows pass with a ✅
  • PR branch has pulled the most recent updates from master branch: usethis::pr_merge_main()
  • If a bug was fixed, a unit test was added.
  • If a new ard_*() function was added, it passes the ARD structural checks from cards::check_ard_structure().
  • If a new ard_*() function was added, set_cli_abort_call() has been set.
  • If a new ard_*() function was added and it depends on another package (such as, broom), is_pkg_installed("broom") has been set in the function call and the following added to the roxygen comments: @examplesIf do.call(asNamespace("cardx")$is_pkg_installed, list(pkg = "broom""))
  • Code coverage is suitable for any new functions/features (generally, 100% coverage for new code): devtools::test_coverage()

Reviewer Checklist (if item does not apply, mark is as complete)

  • If a bug was fixed, a unit test was added.
  • Code coverage is suitable for any new functions/features: devtools::test_coverage()

When the branch is ready to be merged:

  • Update NEWS.md with the changes from this pull request under the heading "# cardx (development version)". If there is an issue associated with the pull request, reference it in parentheses at the end update (see NEWS.md for examples).
  • All GitHub Action workflows pass with a ✅
  • Approve Pull Request
  • Merge the PR. Please use "Squash and merge" or "Rebase and merge".

@ddsjoberg ddsjoberg requested a review from Melkiades February 10, 2025 02:37
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 10, 2025

Unit Tests Summary

  1 files  170 suites   1m 15s ⏱️
168 tests 168 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
702 runs  702 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 0ff904d.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 10, 2025

Unit Test Performance Difference

Additional test case details
Test Suite $Status$ Time on main $±Time$ Test Case
ard_continuous.survey.design 💚 $18.87$ $-1.09$ unstratified_ard_continuous.survey.design_works

Results for commit 83a1e7e

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link
Contributor

@Melkiades Melkiades left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm! Thanks @ddsjoberg for the addition. Is the Remotes: necessary for this PR? I guess it is in general while doing development, right?

@ddsjoberg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Lgtm! Thanks @ddsjoberg for the addition. Is the Remotes: necessary for this PR? I guess it is in general while doing development, right?

You have a good eye! I added this because there was a change in the documentation of cards::ard_categorical(), which is partially inherited by ard_categorical_max(). When I documented locally, it used the dev version of cards, which made the roxygen check fail on CI/CD.

Thanks for the review!

Copy link
Contributor

badge

Code Coverage Summary

Filename                                Stmts    Miss  Cover    Missing
------------------------------------  -------  ------  -------  -----------------------------------
R/add_total_n.survey.design.R              12       0  100.00%
R/ard_aod_wald_test.R                      77       8  89.61%   38-43, 93, 96
R/ard_attributes.survey.design.R            2       0  100.00%
R/ard_car_anova.R                          45       2  95.56%   62, 65
R/ard_car_vif.R                            62       1  98.39%   87
R/ard_categorical_ci.R                    304       1  99.67%   95
R/ard_categorical_ci.survey.design.R      129       1  99.22%   180
R/ard_categorical_max.R                    40       1  97.50%   58
R/ard_categorical.survey.design.R         393       8  97.96%   77, 228-231, 275, 517, 531
R/ard_continuous_ci.R                      28       1  96.43%   38
R/ard_continuous_ci.survey.design.R       138       0  100.00%
R/ard_continuous.survey.design.R          274      14  94.89%   86, 177, 187, 338, 369-370, 418-426
R/ard_dichotomous.survey.design.R          73       3  95.89%   51, 156, 161
R/ard_effectsize_cohens_d.R               103       2  98.06%   69, 122
R/ard_effectsize_hedges_g.R                91       2  97.80%   68, 120
R/ard_emmeans_mean_difference.R            70       0  100.00%
R/ard_missing.survey.design.R              82       1  98.78%   52
R/ard_regression_basic.R                   16       1  93.75%   46
R/ard_regression.R                         73       0  100.00%
R/ard_smd_smd.R                            69       5  92.75%   57, 83-86
R/ard_stats_anova.R                        95       0  100.00%
R/ard_stats_aov.R                          46       0  100.00%
R/ard_stats_chisq_test.R                   40       1  97.50%   39
R/ard_stats_fisher_test.R                  43       1  97.67%   42
R/ard_stats_kruskal_test.R                 36       1  97.22%   38
R/ard_stats_mcnemar_test.R                 80       2  97.50%   63, 106
R/ard_stats_mood_test.R                    49       1  97.96%   45
R/ard_stats_oneway_test.R                  39       0  100.00%
R/ard_stats_poisson_test.R                 76       1  98.68%   59
R/ard_stats_prop_test.R                    85       1  98.82%   43
R/ard_stats_t_test_onesample.R             41       0  100.00%
R/ard_stats_t_test.R                      112       2  98.21%   65, 111
R/ard_stats_wilcox_test_onesample.R        42       0  100.00%
R/ard_stats_wilcox_test.R                  99       2  97.98%   65, 117
R/ard_survey_svychisq.R                    38       1  97.37%   44
R/ard_survey_svyranktest.R                 54       1  98.15%   44
R/ard_survey_svyttest.R                    53       1  98.11%   42
R/ard_survival_survdiff.R                  89       0  100.00%
R/ard_survival_survfit_diff.R              76       0  100.00%
R/ard_survival_survfit.R                  194       5  97.42%   212-216
R/construction_helpers.R                  106      10  90.57%   160-175, 189, 248
R/proportion_ci.R                         203       1  99.51%   462
TOTAL                                    3777      82  97.83%

Diff against main

Filename                    Stmts    Miss  Cover
------------------------  -------  ------  -------
R/ard_categorical_ci.R       +208       0  +0.71%
R/ard_categorical_max.R       +40      +1  +97.50%
R/ard_survival_survfit.R       -3       0  -0.04%
R/proportion_ci.R              +8       0  +0.02%
TOTAL                        +253      +1  +0.13%

Results for commit: 0ff904d

Minimum allowed coverage is 80%

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results

@ddsjoberg ddsjoberg merged commit d0bde86 into main Feb 10, 2025
33 checks passed
@ddsjoberg ddsjoberg deleted the 256-ci_prop-n branch February 10, 2025 15:36
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 10, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Feature Request: Add 'n' to the results returned by theproportion_ci_*() functions
2 participants