Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.25.0 (minor) #2775

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 26, 2025

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 26, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin (source) 8.24.1 -> 8.25.0 age adoption passing confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser (source) 8.24.1 -> 8.25.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)

v8.25.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
  • eslint-plugin: [no-misused-spread] add suggestions (#​10719)
🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [prefer-nullish-coalescing] report on chain expressions in a ternary (#​10708)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-deprecated] report usage of deprecated private identifiers (#​10844)
  • eslint-plugin: [unified-signatures] handle getter-setter (#​10818)
❤️ Thank You

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v8.25.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot requested review from hsiliev and a team as code owners February 26, 2025 10:43
Copy link
Contributor

unit-test-results

 85 files  ±0  123 suites  ±0   1m 42s ⏱️ -2s
474 tests ±0  473 ✅ ±0  1 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
577 runs  ±0  575 ✅ ±0  2 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit bd7f4f2. ± Comparison against base commit cd2772f.

Copy link
Contributor

integration-test-results

 31 files   31 suites   39s ⏱️
114 tests 114 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
127 runs  127 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit bd7f4f2.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 26, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 42.17%. Comparing base (cd2772f) to head (bd7f4f2).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##               main    #2775    +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage     42.17%   42.17%            
  Complexity     3476     3476            
==========================================
  Files          1336     1336            
  Lines         32268    32268            
  Branches       2972     3041    +69     
==========================================
  Hits          13608    13608            
+ Misses        17839    17437   -402     
- Partials        821     1223   +402     
Flag Coverage Δ
integrationtests 51.38% <ø> (ø)
unittests 28.15% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@xiduzo xiduzo added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 26, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 4241ffe Feb 26, 2025
21 checks passed
@xiduzo xiduzo deleted the renovate/minor-8.25-typescript-eslint-monorepo branch February 26, 2025 12:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant