Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update SIBYLL* #219

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update SIBYLL* #219

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

afedynitch
Copy link
Member

Update SIBYLL* based on SIBYLL-2.3d to the latest version (p04).

@afedynitch afedynitch requested a review from Copilot April 10, 2025 03:11
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 96 out of 100 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Files not reviewed (4)
  • CMakeLists.txt: Language not supported
  • default_models.cfg: Language not supported
  • setup.cfg: Language not supported
  • src/fortran/dpmjetIII-19.1: Language not supported
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (3)

tests/test_final_state.py:37

  • Review whether excluding Sibyll23StarMixed from the skip condition is intentional. If legacy support is needed, consider including it.
if Model in [im.Sibyll23dStarMixed, im.Sibyll23eStarMixed]:

src/chromo/models/sibyll.py:425

  • [nitpick] Consider explicitly setting a _library_name attribute in Sibyll23eStarMixed for consistency with similar classes.
class Sibyll23eStarMixed(Sibyll23eStarNoEnh):

README.md:75

  • [nitpick] Clarify the naming in the README to better differentiate between updated SIBYLL-2.3 versions and legacy SIBYLL* entries.
| [SIBYLL* (based on 2.3d)](https://inspirehep.net/literature/2774307)      | *hN, hA (A<=20)*          |  |

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant