Skip to content

im-open/validate-catalog-info

Repository files navigation

validate-catalog-info

This action validates the contents of a catalog-info.yml file. This action can be used during CI or other workflows to ensure the ongoing validity of the file.

The action uses the files defined in the schema directory for validation.

Note

The action does require the catalog-info.yml file to exist on disk prior to running this validation action.

The action creates error annotations for every validation error it finds and a warning annotation for each invalid yaml document inside the catalog-info.yml. GitHub has annotation limits of 10 error and 10 warning annotations per step though, so only 10 errors and 10 warnings will can be shown on the catalog-info.yml file or on the workflow summary. The workflow log still shows all errors.

To address the limitation with the number of annotations, an errors-markdown output is available with the generated markdown for all errors detected in the file. A job summary is created automatically with the same markdown unless generate-job-summary is set to false.

Index

Inputs

Parameter Is Required Default Description
filename false ./catalog-info.yml The name of the catalog-info.yml file.
fail-if-errors false true Error annotations are created for each validation error in the catalog-info.yml file but these errors won't cause the action to fail on their own. If this flag is set the action will be marked as a failure if the catalog-info.yml file is missing, empty or contains any validation errors.
generate-job-summary false true Flag that determines whether a job summary containing validation errors will be created.
  • Only applicable when the file is invalid.
  • This is the same markdown data that is provided in the errors-markdown output.

Outputs

Output Description Possible Values
is-valid A flag indicating whether the catalog-info.yml file is valid or not. true or false
errors-markdown A markdown fragment containing the list of all validation errors in the catalog-info.yml file. output is provided because GitHub limits the number of error annotations that can be created in a single run to 10. true or false

Usage Examples

jobs:
  validate-catalog-info:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest

    steps:
      - name: Checkout Repository
        uses: actions/checkout@v4

      - name: Validate catalog-info.yml
        id: catalogInfo
        uses: im-open/[email protected]
        with:
          filename: ./docs/catalog-info.yml # Defaults to ./catalog-info.yml
          fail-if-errors: false             # Defaults to true
          generate-job-summary: false       # Defaults to true

      - name: Add PR comment if catalog-info.yml is invalid
        if: steps.catalogInfo.outputs.is-valid == 'false'
        uses: im-open/update-pr-comment@v1
        with:
          github-token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} # Special per-job token generated by GH for interacting with the repo
          comment-identifier: catalog-info-errors
          comment-content: ${{ steps.catalogInfo.outputs.errors-markdown }}

Contributing

When creating PRs, please review the following guidelines:

  • The action code does not contain sensitive information.
  • At least one of the commit messages contains the appropriate +semver: keywords listed under Incrementing the Version for major and minor increments.
  • The action has been recompiled. See Recompiling Manually for details.
  • The README.md has been updated with the latest version of the action. See Updating the README.md for details.
  • Any tests in the build-and-review-pr workflow are passing

Incrementing the Version

This repo uses git-version-lite in its workflows to examine commit messages to determine whether to perform a major, minor or patch increment on merge if source code changes have been made. The following table provides the fragment that should be included in a commit message to active different increment strategies.

Increment Type Commit Message Fragment
major +semver:breaking
major +semver:major
minor +semver:feature
minor +semver:minor
patch default increment type, no comment needed

Source Code Changes

The files and directories that are considered source code are listed in the files-with-code and dirs-with-code arguments in both the build-and-review-pr and increment-version-on-merge workflows.

If a PR contains source code changes, the README.md should be updated with the latest action version and the action should be recompiled. The build-and-review-pr workflow will ensure these steps are performed when they are required. The workflow will provide instructions for completing these steps if the PR Author does not initially complete them.

If a PR consists solely of non-source code changes like changes to the README.md or workflows under ./.github/workflows, version updates and recompiles do not need to be performed.

Recompiling Manually

This command utilizes esbuild to bundle the action and its dependencies into a single file located in the dist folder. If changes are made to the action's source code, the action must be recompiled by running the following command:

# Installs dependencies and bundles the code
npm run build

Updating the README.md

If changes are made to the action's source code, the usage examples section of this file should be updated with the next version of the action. Each instance of this action should be updated. This helps users know what the latest tag is without having to navigate to the Tags page of the repository. See Incrementing the Version for details on how to determine what the next version will be or consult the first workflow run for the PR which will also calculate the next version.

Tests

The build and review PR workflow includes tests which are linked to a status check. That status check needs to succeed before a PR is merged to the default branch. When a PR comes from a branch, there should not be any issues running the tests. When a PR comes from a fork, tests may not have the required permissions or access to run since the GITHUB_TOKEN only has read access set for all scopes. Also, forks cannot access other secrets in the repository. In these scenarios, a fork may need to be merged into an intermediate branch by the repository owners to ensure the tests run successfully prior to merging to the default branch.

Code of Conduct

This project has adopted the im-open's Code of Conduct.

License

Copyright © 2023, Extend Health, LLC. Code released under the MIT license.

About

An action that can validate a single catalog-info.yml file

Topics

Resources

License

Code of conduct

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Contributors 3

  •  
  •  
  •