Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IFA scenario #75

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 12, 2023
Merged

Conversation

hussain-jafari
Copy link
Contributor

IFA scenario

Description

Changes and notes

Replace universal BEP with IFA scenario. Only change to intervention.py is checking if we are in IFA scenario, in which case we assign everyone to the IFA intervention. Otherwise, go through same logic as before.

Verification and Testing

Checked that we have everyone on IFA in IFA scenario and that this is the same way that mms behaves.

{"intervention": 'ifa'},
index=pop.index,
)
self.population_view.update(pop_update)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: you could put the second of these outside of the if/else and then delete this line.

@hussain-jafari hussain-jafari merged commit 52ea533 into model_10_runs Dec 12, 2023
8 checks passed
@hussain-jafari hussain-jafari deleted the feature/MIC-4747_model10.1_observers branch December 12, 2023 17:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants