Removing cbcpy.

[joshua-cogliati-inl]

---

Pull Request Description

What issue does this change request address?

Closes #41

What are the significant changes in functionality due to this change request?

Removes cbcpy from windows.

---

For Change Control Board: Change Request Review

The following review must be completed by an authorized member of the Change Control Board.

• 1. Review all computer code.
• 2. If any changes occur to the input syntax, there must be an accompanying change to the user manual.
• 3. Make sure the Python code and commenting standards are respected (camelBack, etc.) - See on the wiki for details.
• 4. Regression tests have to complete successfully.
• 5. If significant functionality is added, there must be tests added to check this. Tests should cover all possible options. Multiple short tests are preferred over one large test.
• 6. The merge request must reference an issue. If the issue is closed, the issue close checklist shall be done.

[joshua-cogliati-inl]

Note that you can see the results of running LOGOS in python 3.8 without cbcpy in: https://civet.inl.gov/job/1151586/

So with cbcpy ( https://civet.inl.gov/job/1145673/ ):

FAILED:

Failed C:\Git\opt\build_root\raven\plugins\LOGOS/tests\Scheduling\logos_rcpsp



PASSED: 28

SKIPPED: 46

FAILED: 1

... there were failed tests for plugin LOGOS!

Without cbcpy ( https://civet.inl.gov/job/1151586/ ):

FAILED:

Failed C:\Git\opt\build_root\raven\plugins\LOGOS/tests\Scheduling\logos_rcpsp



PASSED: 28

SKIPPED: 46

FAILED: 1

... there were failed tests for plugin LOGOS!

[wangcj05]

PR looks good. Probably need to skip the logos_rcpsp test on windows since it is failing now because of no cbc solver.

[joshua-cogliati-inl]

Okay, I will add the skip.

[wangcj05]

checklist is good, and tests are green.

[wangcj05]

@joshua-cogliati-inl Thanks a lot!

[joshua-cogliati-inl]

I just updated the submodule ID in idaholab/raven#1933