fix: Fix Hyperion and bows...

[Tebarem]

Some weird issues with the current Flecs_ecs so I made sure we are using a stable version and commit. Also fixed bows really quick since my old pr didnt include changes that should already have been there

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results for general

ray_intersection/aabb_size_0.1                     [  33.6 ns ...  33.6 ns ]      -0.01%
ray_intersection/aabb_size_1                       [  33.6 ns ...  33.7 ns ]      +0.37%
ray_intersection/aabb_size_10                      [  24.5 ns ...  24.4 ns ]      -0.18%
ray_intersection/ray_distance_1                    [  13.4 ns ...  13.4 ns ]      +0.06%
ray_intersection/ray_distance_5                    [  13.5 ns ...  13.5 ns ]      +0.33%
ray_intersection/ray_distance_20                   [  13.5 ns ...  13.5 ns ]      +0.10%
overlap/no_overlap                                 [  24.5 ns ...  24.5 ns ]      +0.05%
overlap/partial_overlap                            [  24.7 ns ...  24.6 ns ]      -0.03%
overlap/full_containment                           [  22.5 ns ...  22.5 ns ]      +0.03%
point_containment/inside                           [   4.9 ns ...   4.9 ns ]      -0.04%
point_containment/outside                          [   4.4 ns ...   4.4 ns ]      +0.04%
point_containment/boundary                         [   4.9 ns ...   4.9 ns ]      -0.27%

Comparing to 190d414

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 20.81%. Comparing base (190d414) to head (7587e48).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
events/tag/src/module/bow.rs	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #879      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   20.97%   20.81%   -0.17%     
==========================================
  Files         160      160              
  Lines       16828    16828              
  Branches      469      469              
==========================================
- Hits         3529     3502      -27     
- Misses      13235    13262      +27     
  Partials       64       64              

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
crates/hyperion/src/simulation/entity_kind.rs	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...s/hyperion/src/simulation/metadata/entity/flags.rs	20.68% <ø> (-3.45%)	⬇️
crates/system-order/src/lib.rs	91.20% <ø> (-1.10%)	⬇️
events/tag/src/module/attack.rs	0.00% <ø> (ø)
events/tag/src/module/chat.rs	0.00% <ø> (ø)
events/tag/src/module/level.rs	0.00% <ø> (ø)
events/tag/src/module/regeneration.rs	0.00% <ø> (ø)
events/tag/src/module/bow.rs	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 6 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results for general

ray_intersection/aabb_size_0.1                     [  35.0 ns ...  35.0 ns ]      +0.08%
ray_intersection/aabb_size_1                       [  34.5 ns ...  34.6 ns ]      +0.29%
ray_intersection/aabb_size_10                      [  24.8 ns ...  24.8 ns ]      -0.04%
ray_intersection/ray_distance_1                    [  13.8 ns ...  13.8 ns ]      -0.18%
ray_intersection/ray_distance_5                    [  13.7 ns ...  13.8 ns ]      +0.04%
ray_intersection/ray_distance_20                   [  13.8 ns ...  13.8 ns ]      -0.21%
overlap/no_overlap                                 [  25.1 ns ...  25.1 ns ]      +0.08%
overlap/partial_overlap                            [  25.2 ns ...  25.2 ns ]      -0.21%
overlap/full_containment                           [  22.8 ns ...  22.8 ns ]      -0.00%
point_containment/inside                           [   4.9 ns ...   5.0 ns ]      +0.30%
point_containment/outside                          [   4.4 ns ...   4.4 ns ]      -0.05%
point_containment/boundary                         [   5.0 ns ...   5.0 ns ]      -0.17%

Comparing to 190d414

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results for general

ray_intersection/aabb_size_0.1                     [  33.9 ns ...  33.9 ns ]      +0.10%
ray_intersection/aabb_size_1                       [  32.8 ns ...  32.8 ns ]      +0.01%
ray_intersection/aabb_size_10                      [  24.3 ns ...  24.3 ns ]      +0.22%
ray_intersection/ray_distance_1                    [  13.8 ns ...  13.8 ns ]      +0.08%
ray_intersection/ray_distance_5                    [  13.8 ns ...  13.8 ns ]      +0.11%
ray_intersection/ray_distance_20                   [  13.8 ns ...  13.8 ns ]      -0.16%
overlap/no_overlap                                 [  24.8 ns ...  24.8 ns ]      -0.11%
overlap/partial_overlap                            [  25.1 ns ...  25.1 ns ]      -0.03%
overlap/full_containment                           [  22.5 ns ...  22.5 ns ]      +0.09%
point_containment/inside                           [   4.9 ns ...   4.9 ns ]      +0.09%
point_containment/outside                          [   4.4 ns ...   4.4 ns ]      +0.24%
point_containment/boundary                         [   5.0 ns ...   5.0 ns ]      +0.05%

Comparing to 190d414

[TestingPlant]

I don't think we should downgrade the flecs version because we want to be able to take advantage of newer safety fixes such as Indra-db/Flecs-Rust@ec639b3 in the latest flecs main branch. The Cargo.lock file should also ensure that everyone is using the same flecs commit for compiling Hyperion so I don't believe that using the latest main branch an issue.

[Tebarem]

Its a version that Indra told me to use not on hyperion but in one of my personal projects. So I decided to use it here as well and it stopped the crashes. I went through everything possible. I Rewrote blocks to use Arc Cause i thought the issue might be when the player spawns and couldn't get anything working it didn't make any sense. I think its just a bug with the latest commit.

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results for general

ray_intersection/aabb_size_0.1                     [  35.1 ns ...  35.2 ns ]      +0.41%
ray_intersection/aabb_size_1                       [  34.0 ns ...  33.8 ns ]      -0.44%
ray_intersection/aabb_size_10                      [  24.8 ns ...  24.8 ns ]      +0.10%
ray_intersection/ray_distance_1                    [  13.8 ns ...  13.9 ns ]      +0.33%
ray_intersection/ray_distance_5                    [  13.9 ns ...  13.9 ns ]      +0.41%
ray_intersection/ray_distance_20                   [  13.8 ns ...  13.8 ns ]      -0.03%
overlap/no_overlap                                 [  25.1 ns ...  25.2 ns ]      +0.12%
overlap/partial_overlap                            [  25.2 ns ...  25.2 ns ]      +0.15%
overlap/full_containment                           [  22.8 ns ...  22.8 ns ]      -0.01%
point_containment/inside                           [   4.9 ns ...   4.9 ns ]      +0.03%
point_containment/outside                          [   4.5 ns ...   4.5 ns ]      +0.13%
point_containment/boundary                         [   4.9 ns ...   4.9 ns ]      +0.03%

Comparing to 190d414

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results for general

ray_intersection/aabb_size_0.1                     [  36.8 ns ...  37.0 ns ]      +0.36%
ray_intersection/aabb_size_1                       [  35.0 ns ...  34.9 ns ]      -0.10%
ray_intersection/aabb_size_10                      [  30.9 ns ...  24.6 ns ]     -20.27%*
ray_intersection/ray_distance_1                    [  13.9 ns ...  13.9 ns ]      +0.17%
ray_intersection/ray_distance_5                    [  13.8 ns ...  13.8 ns ]      -0.13%
ray_intersection/ray_distance_20                   [  13.9 ns ...  13.8 ns ]      -0.33%
overlap/no_overlap                                 [  39.2 ns ...  38.8 ns ]      -0.89%
overlap/partial_overlap                            [  38.3 ns ...  38.4 ns ]      +0.27%
overlap/full_containment                           [  42.0 ns ...  41.9 ns ]      -0.17%
point_containment/inside                           [   5.0 ns ...   5.0 ns ]      +0.45%
point_containment/outside                          [   4.4 ns ...   4.4 ns ]      +0.07%
point_containment/boundary                         [   5.7 ns ...   5.7 ns ]      -0.13%

Comparing to 190d414

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results for general

ray_intersection/aabb_size_0.1                     [  33.7 ns ...  33.7 ns ]      +0.08%
ray_intersection/aabb_size_1                       [  33.8 ns ...  33.7 ns ]      -0.31%
ray_intersection/aabb_size_10                      [  24.6 ns ...  24.5 ns ]      -0.16%
ray_intersection/ray_distance_1                    [  13.6 ns ...  13.5 ns ]      -0.84%
ray_intersection/ray_distance_5                    [  13.6 ns ...  13.6 ns ]      -0.09%
ray_intersection/ray_distance_20                   [  13.5 ns ...  13.5 ns ]      -0.09%
overlap/no_overlap                                 [  24.5 ns ...  24.4 ns ]      -0.30%
overlap/partial_overlap                            [  24.7 ns ...  24.7 ns ]      -0.09%
overlap/full_containment                           [  22.5 ns ...  22.5 ns ]      +0.20%
point_containment/inside                           [   4.9 ns ...   4.9 ns ]      +0.15%
point_containment/outside                          [   4.4 ns ...   4.4 ns ]      -0.48%
point_containment/boundary                         [   4.9 ns ...   4.9 ns ]      -0.04%

Comparing to 190d414

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results for general

ray_intersection/aabb_size_0.1                     [  33.9 ns ...  33.8 ns ]      -0.22%
ray_intersection/aabb_size_1                       [  34.4 ns ...  34.2 ns ]      -0.40%
ray_intersection/aabb_size_10                      [  24.3 ns ...  24.3 ns ]      -0.13%
ray_intersection/ray_distance_1                    [  13.5 ns ...  13.4 ns ]      -0.70%
ray_intersection/ray_distance_5                    [  13.5 ns ...  13.5 ns ]      +0.01%
ray_intersection/ray_distance_20                   [  13.5 ns ...  13.5 ns ]      +0.29%
overlap/no_overlap                                 [  24.5 ns ...  24.5 ns ]      +0.20%
overlap/partial_overlap                            [  24.6 ns ...  24.8 ns ]      +0.76%
overlap/full_containment                           [  22.5 ns ...  22.5 ns ]      +0.09%
point_containment/inside                           [   4.9 ns ...   4.9 ns ]      +0.41%
point_containment/outside                          [   4.4 ns ...   4.4 ns ]      -0.14%
point_containment/boundary                         [   4.9 ns ...   4.9 ns ]      +0.19%

Comparing to 190d414