Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run regression tests on Travis #35

Open
wants to merge 54 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

nightlark
Copy link
Contributor

Runs stencil4d-otf example using the dragonfly, fattree, and hypre, and torus network configurations, and compares the resulting output files to a baseline set of output files.

  • Some times check to make sure the value is within a tolerance; some floating point time values are very slightly (10^-6) different on Travis than when the same test and code is run on LC
  • Busy time in msg-stats files are ignored; they vary significantly between runs even on the same machine

nightlark and others added 30 commits July 10, 2019 11:57
Run TraceR with a dfly network on the stencil4d-otf example on Travis
@nightlark
Copy link
Contributor Author

The push build for this branch passes: https://travis-ci.com/nightlark/TraceR/builds/129162778

The failure is because #38 resulted in values changing in the CODES output files, as well as the TraceR WallTime values printed out.

@bhatele bhatele changed the base branch from master to develop November 19, 2020 13:13
@nightlark
Copy link
Contributor Author

Given recent changes to Travis, I don't think running tests there is as good as it used to be. Would be better to use GitHub Actions now.

@bhatele
Copy link
Member

bhatele commented Feb 24, 2021

Given recent changes to Travis, I don't think running tests there is as good as it used to be. Would be better to use GitHub Actions now.

Yes we are planning to move to GitHub actions soon.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants