Fix Mac Lane reference (#278)

* Fix Mac Lane reference * Fix improperly directed quotes * Add fixes to errata-1.3.0.md
hmemcpy · Sep 30, 2021 · 26b0714 · 26b0714
1 parent 6c25190
commit 26b0714
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 3 changed files with 10 additions and 3 deletions.
diff --git a/errata-1.3.0.md b/errata-1.3.0.md
@@ -1,6 +1,13 @@
 ## A list of typos/mistakes that were fixed after the release of the new edition (1.3.0) (12 August, 2019).
 (see errata for the original edition until 1.3.0 [here](https://github.com/hmemcpy/milewski-ctfp-pdf/blob/master/errata-1.0.0.md))
 
+### Preface
+
+* [#278](https://github.com/hmemcpy/milewski-ctfp-pdf/pull/278) - Fixed reference to Saunders Mac Lane's *Categories for the Working Mathematician*. Was previously misreferenced as "*Category Theory* for the Working Mathematician."
+
+### 12. Limits and Colimits
+
+* [#278](https://github.com/hmemcpy/milewski-ctfp-pdf/pull/278) - Fixed formatting of quotation marks around "selecting." Were previously pointing the wrong direction.
 ### 18. Adjunctions
 
 * [#228](https://github.com/hmemcpy/milewski-ctfp-pdf/pull/228) - Typo (adjuncion -> adjunction)

diff --git a/src/content/0.0/preface.tex b/src/content/0.0/preface.tex
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
 Of course when using hand-waving arguments you run the risk of saying
 something blatantly wrong, so I will try to make sure that there is
 solid mathematical theory behind informal arguments in this book. I do
-have a worn-out copy of Saunders Mac Lane's \emph{Category Theory for
+have a worn-out copy of Saunders Mac Lane's \emph{Categories for
 the Working Mathematician} on my nightstand.
 
 Since this is category theory \emph{for programmers} I will illustrate

diff --git a/src/content/2.2/limits-and-colimits.tex b/src/content/2.2/limits-and-colimits.tex
@@ -29,8 +29,8 @@
 morphisms.
 
 What's great about this approach is that it builds on categorical
-notions, eschewing the imprecise descriptions like "selecting
-objects", taken straight from the hunter-gatherer lexicon of our
+notions, eschewing the imprecise descriptions like ``selecting
+objects,'' taken straight from the hunter-gatherer lexicon of our
 ancestors. And, incidentally, it is also easily generalized, because
 nothing can stop us from using categories more complex than $\cat{2}$
 to define our patterns.