DMP-4630: Flyway Updates : Disable Automated jobs #2464
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Ben-Edwards-cgi
requested review from
davet1985,
jackmaloney,
cakeben,
akozichev,
ssian2 and
DonnaHull
and removed request for
a team
hemantasharma1129
approved these changes
Jan 21, 2025
jackmaloney
reviewed
Jan 21, 2025
src/main/resources/db/migration/postgres/V1_430__disabled_some_automated_jobs.sql
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
jackmaloney
approved these changes
Jan 21, 2025
chrisbellingham-hmcts
approved these changes
Jan 21, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Links
Change description
Summary of Git Diff
This Git Diff introduces a new SQL migration file that disables specific automated tasks in the database.
Highlights
V1_430__disabled_some_automated_jobs.sqlautomated_tasktable.task_enabledflag is set tofalsefor the followingaut_idvalues: 22, 25, 28, 29, 30, and 31.Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one with "x")