Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Document possible types for the v attribute of Client.Do() #416

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2024

Conversation

CubicrootXYZ
Copy link
Member

Add documentation for the v attribute in Client.Do() as it behaves very differently depending on the provided type.

@CubicrootXYZ CubicrootXYZ requested a review from a team as a code owner April 22, 2024 08:34
@apricote apricote changed the title docu: Document possible types for the v attribute of Client.Do() docs: Document possible types for the v attribute of Client.Do() Apr 22, 2024
Copy link
Member

@apricote apricote left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.41%. Comparing base (d181eb6) to head (302f44b).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #416   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.41%   80.41%           
=======================================
  Files          32       32           
  Lines        5750     5750           
=======================================
  Hits         4624     4624           
  Misses        718      718           
  Partials      408      408           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@apricote apricote merged commit d4f67cb into hetznercloud:main Apr 22, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants