Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deprecate using Pipenv without a lockfile #1695

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 12, 2024
Merged

Conversation

edmorley
Copy link
Member

@edmorley edmorley commented Nov 11, 2024

Using Pipenv without a lockfile can result in nondeterministic package installs, and so for some years if Pipfile.lock is missing we've emitted a recommendation in the build log to add it.

In addition, Pipenv has also since deprecated the --skip-lockfile feature upstream.

As such, we'd like to sunset support for using Pipenv without a lockfile, but first we should make the existing warning more explicit and include instructions on how to generate a lockfile.

Towards #1702.
GUS-W-17201692.

@edmorley edmorley self-assigned this Nov 11, 2024
Using Pipenv without a lockfile can result in nondeterministic
package installs, and so for some years if `Pipfile.lock` is
missing we've emitted a recommendation in the build log to
add it.

In addition, Pipenv has also since deprecated the
`--skip-lockfile` feature upstream.

As such, we'd like to sunset support for using Pipenv without
a lockfile, but first we should make the existing warning more
explicit and include instructions on how to generate a lockfile.

GUS-W-17201692.
@edmorley edmorley force-pushed the pipenv-lockfile-warning branch from 3c186c8 to 39a41dd Compare November 11, 2024 15:13
@edmorley edmorley marked this pull request as ready for review November 11, 2024 15:21
@edmorley edmorley requested a review from a team as a code owner November 11, 2024 15:21
@edmorley edmorley merged commit ddf6aea into main Nov 12, 2024
7 checks passed
@edmorley edmorley deleted the pipenv-lockfile-warning branch November 12, 2024 10:29
@heroku-linguist heroku-linguist bot mentioned this pull request Nov 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants