-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement polar decomposition #1697
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…com:helmholtz-analytics/heat into features/1696-Implement_Polar_Decomposition
Thank you for the PR! |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1697 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 92.26% 92.36% +0.09%
==========================================
Files 84 85 +1
Lines 12445 12618 +173
==========================================
+ Hits 11482 11654 +172
- Misses 963 964 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Thank you for the PR! |
…Polar_Decomposition
Thank you for the PR! |
batched QR must be merged first #1720 |
Thank you for the PR! |
Thank you for the PR! |
…com:helmholtz-analytics/heat into features/1696-Implement_Polar_Decomposition
Thank you for the PR! |
1 similar comment
Thank you for the PR! |
…=0' of github.com:helmholtz-analytics/heat into features/1736-QR_for_non-tall-skinny_matrices_and_split=0
…=0' into features/1696-Implement_Polar_Decomposition
#1744 needs to be merged first |
Thank you for the PR! |
1 similar comment
Thank you for the PR! |
Thank you for the PR! |
btw: to cover the missing line will probably very difficult as one needs to find a matrix such that the (inexact) randomized condition number estimator estimates its condition between 1e5 and 1e7 |
Due Diligence
benchmarks: created for new functionality to discuss: add further benchmarks without having the existing ones refactored?currently not availablebenchmarks: performance improved or maintainedcurrently not availableDescription
Issue/s resolved: #
Changes proposed:
see #1696
Type of change
Memory requirements
Performance
Does this change modify the behaviour of other functions? If so, which?
yes / no