Create additional fields for hbz publishing catalogue

[TobiasNx]

Related to #6. Create tags for specific hbz catalogue.

I am not sure:

• How to reuse the GND Elements without copying them.
• • Tried it like this: 517869a

[TobiasNx]

I am not sure how we can reuse the DNB tags without copying them?

[Phu2]

I'm not sure either if 517869a#diff-6ab233441d2457fd4d4370036d454637fc9ac8133b4d0226ffffa3b206391d18 will work...

We should resolve the fest failures first, then try it out. What do you think?

[Phu2]

Disabled Qodana workflow as set in the upstream repo. See manual https://docs.github.com/de/actions/managing-workflow-runs-and-deployments/managing-workflow-runs/disabling-and-enabling-a-workflow

[TobiasNx]

I'm not sure either if 517869a#diff-6ab233441d2457fd4d4370036d454637fc9ac8133b4d0226ffffa3b206391d18 will work...

We should resolve the fest failures first, then try it out. What do you think?

Sounds good!

[Phu2]

I think we still have to follow this step

c. modify the expected number of data elements at src/test/java/de/gwdg/metadataqa/marc/utils/DataElementsStaticticsTest.java

in the README but don't know how to identify this number. @TobiasNx Any clue?

[Phu2]

Ah build log says:

294.1 Failed tests: testStatistics(de.gwdg.metadataqa.marc.utils.DataElementsStaticticsTest): expected:<228> but was:<262>

[TobiasNx]

https://github.com/hbz/qa-catalogue/actions/runs/10469385366/job/28992298463?pr=1#step:4:16664

[Phu2]

Next test failure:

Failed tests: testPatternMatchingWithSubfield(de.gwdg.metadataqa.marc.analysis.bl.UseCaseTest): expected:<[110$e, 111$e, 100$e, 700$e, 710$e, 711$e, 720$e, 751$e, 752$e, 775$e, 788$e]> but was:<[100$e, 110$e, 111$e, 700$e, 710$e, 711$e, 720$e, 751$e, 752$e, 775$e, 788$e]>

https://github.com/hbz/qa-catalogue/actions/runs/10472986275/job/29003791025#step:4:16625

@TobiasNx 100$e is expected at 3rd position, but it's at 1st ??

[TobiasNx]

Next test failure:

Failed tests: testPatternMatchingWithSubfield(de.gwdg.metadataqa.marc.analysis.bl.UseCaseTest): expected:<[110$e, 111$e, 100$e, 700$e, 710$e, 711$e, 720$e, 751$e, 752$e, 775$e, 788$e]> but was:<[100$e, 110$e, 111$e, 700$e, 710$e, 711$e, 720$e, 751$e, 752$e, 775$e, 788$e]>

hbz/qa-catalogue/actions/runs/10472986275/job/29003791025#step:4:16625

@TobiasNx 100$e is expected at 3rd position, but it's at 1st ??

I am confused, I think I did not change anything that touches this test. But I will have another look.

[pkiraly]

I guess it is a mistake.

[TobiasNx]

I added the DNB elements that are re-used in hbz again until pkiraly#507 is solved.

[TobiasNx]

@Phu2 should we merge?

[Phu2]

Commits 55, Files changed 110. Wow ;) Let's merge.